The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (Truckrolet, klhansen), 494 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,268
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1143289 01/06/2016 2:51 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
Good evening bolters!

I am wanting to put a set of 20's on my truck, and really like the looks of the Boss 338 style wheels so I went to my local tire shop today to talk it over and get some pricing ideas and the sales person I always work with told me that with putting modern wheels like this on an old truck, you run into a spacing issue with what some call "backspace" or "offset"

I am assuming a person could use spacers to get the wheel out some. In the past I would not use spacers because I didn't think that was safe but I understand they have been improved.

Anyway, just wondering if anyone here on the forum has put wheels like the Boss 338 on their 60-66 truck and what they had to do to accommodate the wheels.

My truck is still 6 lug.

Thanks in advance for any replies!

Kevin

Last edited by kthomas; 01/06/2016 2:52 AM.
kthomas #1143414 01/06/2016 11:36 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
I get the impression from your post that perhaps you're not familiar with the terms "backspace" and "offset". Those are 2 different dimensions on a wheel, with offset being dependent on both the backspacing and wheel width.
Backspacing is the dimension from the wheel mounting surface (WMS) to the inside edge of the wheel flange on the backside of the wheel. This is a critical dimension, as it determines clearances in relation to the suspension, steering, and brake components. Offset is the dimension from the wheel centerline to the WMS, usually measured in millimeters. The backspace and wheel width both have an effect on this dimension. A wheel that has the same amount of backspace and front space would have a 0 offset. If the wheel has more backspace than front space, then it is Positive offset, and if the front space is great than backspace, that is Negative offset.
Most wheels for the vintage trucks we deal with use either Negative or 0 offset, and average 3 to 3 1/2" backspace. Modern trucks, mainly due to the suspension designs, tend to use Positive offset wheels. This is mainly in an effort to package IFS 4x4 systems while not increasing track width, but also to get better handling getting the centerline of the balljoint as close to the centerline of the wheel.
That said, ideally, you should really try to see if the wheel comes in the correct backspaceing for your truck, which as mentioned, should be around 3 1/2". The offset will vary depending on what width you're considering. If you must use a spacer, use the type that bolts to your hub and has it's own separate set of wheel studs that the wheel actually mounts to. Those are much safer that using an excessively thick spacer.
A few words of caution, using a 20" wheel is going to increase not only the rolling mass of the wheel, but also unsprung weight. Both can lead to handling and ride issues if not addressed. You'll want make sure the suspension system is in 100% working order, and preferably with upgraded shock to make up for the unsprung weight. Even more critical is going to be the brake system. The stock drums will not be adequate. At minimum, power assist should be added, and realistically, you should consider a power assisted disk brake upgrade with at least a 12" or better rotor. Another word of caution with wheel widths and backspace/offset; If you get too or too little offset, that will change the scrub radius angle. This is a critical handling angle, and while there is some leeway, going to far out can cause handling issues.


Bill Burmeister
LONGBOX55 #1143415 01/06/2016 11:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
Originally Posted by LONGBOX55
I get the impression from your post that perhaps you're not familiar with the terms "backspace" and "offset". Those are 2 different dimensions on a wheel, with offset being dependent on both the backspacing and wheel width.
Backspacing is the dimension from the wheel mounting surface (WMS) to the inside edge of the wheel flange on the backside of the wheel. This is a critical dimension, as it determines clearances in relation to the suspension, steering, and brake components. Offset is the dimension from the wheel centerline to the WMS, usually measured in millimeters. The backspace and wheel width both have an effect on this dimension. A wheel that has the same amount of backspace and front space would have a 0 offset. If the wheel has more backspace than front space, then it is Positive offset, and if the front space is great than backspace, that is Negative offset.
Most wheels for the vintage trucks we deal with use either Negative or 0 offset, and average 3 to 3 1/2" backspace. Modern trucks, mainly due to the suspension designs, tend to use Positive offset wheels. This is mainly in an effort to package IFS 4x4 systems while not increasing track width, but also to get better handling getting the centerline of the balljoint as close to the centerline of the wheel.
That said, ideally, you should really try to see if the wheel comes in the correct backspaceing for your truck, which as mentioned, should be around 3 1/2". The offset will vary depending on what width you're considering. If you must use a spacer, use the type that bolts to your hub and has it's own separate set of wheel studs that the wheel actually mounts to. Those are much safer that using an excessively thick spacer.
A few words of caution, using a 20" wheel is going to increase not only the rolling mass of the wheel, but also unsprung weight. Both can lead to handling and ride issues if not addressed. You'll want make sure the suspension system is in 100% working order, and preferably with upgraded shock to make up for the unsprung weight. Even more critical is going to be the brake system. The stock drums will not be adequate. At minimum, power assist should be added, and realistically, you should consider a power assisted disk brake upgrade with at least a 12" or better rotor. Another word of caution with wheel widths and backspace/offset; If you get too or too little offset, that will change the scrub radius angle. This is a critical handling angle, and while there is some leeway, going to far out can cause handling issues.

Thanks Bill,

You are certainly well versed in this subject and I appreciate that. While I didn't explain it properly and I will admit this is my first time to inquire about putting 20 inch wheels on my 65, I did get a pretty good understanding from my long time tire shop rep yesterday and understand there are clearance issues to be considered.

I do know that I have seen many trucks with these style of wheels on them, I am just wanting to know what it entails to put a set on so Thank You, for passing along the very much appreciated info.

Kevin

kthomas #1143598 01/07/2016 10:42 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
You're most certainly welcome. I did get the impression that your tire rep is giving you good information, I've been in the business, until about a year ago, for 23 years myself.


Bill Burmeister
LONGBOX55 #1143609 01/08/2016 12:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 275
Well,

I have a lot of respect for folks like you! Today I told my shop manager what you said and he said "that guy knows his stuff" !

I have always been old school and never really cared for modern looks but just thought it would really make my short wide look good but I may end up leaving it alone.

Kevin

LONGBOX55 #1143925 01/09/2016 3:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
Originally Posted by LONGBOX55
... Even more critical is going to be the brake system. The stock drums will not be adequate. ....

Just as a point of reference.... Changing the wheel diameter will in no way affect braking.... changing the tire diameter changes braking.



In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
Hot Rod John #1143990 01/09/2016 10:28 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Originally Posted by Hot Rod John
Just as a point of reference.... Changing the wheel diameter will in no way affect braking.... changing the tire diameter changes braking.
A little clarification on what I posted; I was more meaning about the additional rotational mass of the 20" wheels, rather than a change in diameter. Those 20" wheels, especially the cast aluminum ones, are much heavier than the standard steel or even a stock size aluminum counterpart. The additional weight will effect braking.


Bill Burmeister
LONGBOX55 #1144109 01/10/2016 3:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
The wheel will weigh more, the tire will weigh less.

IMO Bill's braking theory is correct, but in reality it has been my experience that it is not an issue.

While I agree that there will be a weight difference I've updated numerous vehicles in my life and have yet to ever have any braking issue when updating tires and wheels.

This is especially true on a pickup truck that has over sized brakes, sized for carrying payloads.

Case in point, my '65 C10 had stock brakes, yet the rolling stock was altered. No adverse handling or braking issues. http://i645.photobucket.com/albums/...Trim%2001-24-2015/RR3-42_zps5434b9dd.jpg

FWIW: In regard to putting 20" wheels, specifically 5 spoke Boss 338's, on a stock braked, 60-66 truck: They look horrible. A 15" 5 spoke wheel looks good, but the 20's are to big, they make the stock brake drums look tiny.


In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
kthomas #1144821 01/15/2016 8:39 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
The tire will not weigh less. If anything, it will weigh about the same, possibly a little more depending on size. I've mounted enough of them to know.


Bill Burmeister
LONGBOX55 #1145248 01/18/2016 1:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
So the tire no longer follows the laws of physics?

For the sake of discussion.... You're saying a 35" o.d. tire for a 15" wheel weighs the same as a 35" o.d tire for a 20" wheel?

Logic dictates otherwise.

Last edited by Hot Rod John; 01/18/2016 1:15 AM.

In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
kthomas #1145384 01/18/2016 10:12 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Using the tire sizes you've specified, and checking the specifications on them, the 20" rim diameter tire weighs an average of 6.5 pounds more than the comparable 15" tire of the same outside diameter. You do have to keep in mind that as the tire sidewall is shortened, the load capacity id diminished. In order to keep that load capacity the same, the tire has to be built with thicker sidewalls in order to keep the capacity the same as a smaller wheel size tire of the same outside diameter.


Bill Burmeister
LONGBOX55 #1145685 01/20/2016 3:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,262
I stand corrected... Bill is right: the 20" version is indeed 2 lbs heavier than the 15". I also noticed the 20" tire is also twice the price!

So the wheel is heavier... and the tire is heavier... and the tire costs twice the price... explain to me again why folks are running these big wheels?


In the Stovebolt Gallery ~~ "The Orange Crate" 1965 C10 SWB Step Side Build Thread

Inspired to be different. Different in a way of my own, not in a way that others strive.
kthomas #1145764 01/20/2016 10:24 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
It's all about the look. Big wheels are the "in" thing. I've seen the opposite end of the spectrum, too. Back in the late '80s and early '90s when trying to fit 13" wheels on Impalas was the big thing.


Bill Burmeister
kthomas #1146735 01/27/2016 1:16 AM
N
Neverdone
Unregistered
Neverdone
Unregistered
N
You will lose your inner fenders ..
Dan

#1147005 01/28/2016 10:34 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Originally Posted by Neverdone
You will lose your inner fenders ..
Dan
What makes you say that? A 20" wheel with properly sized tires will make no difference to the inner fenderwells. You might be surprised at just how big of tire will fit in there. Only time it would be an issue is if the suspension is slammed all the way down to ground, which would make the truck barely drivable anyway.


Bill Burmeister

Moderated by  Hambone, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.031s Queries: 14 (0.028s) Memory: 0.6671 MB (Peak: 0.7815 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 05:59:08 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS