The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
11 members (TUTS 59, Hotrod Lincoln, BLUEMEANIE, homer52, JW51, cmayna, Guitplayer, Possum, Joe W, UtahYork, 1 invisible), 514 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,271
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1120049 08/20/2015 3:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
Hi all,

I'm thinking of improving the running gear on my 3100. I've been offered a left hand drive Jag XJ40 complete front. Firstly does this fit? And is it an easy swap.

As usual any advice/opinions greatly recieved


Now the proud owner of a '51 Chevy 3100
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,393
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,393
Bubblemaker, Follow this thread or contact him. A Jag expert.

https://www.stovebolt.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/768999/1/Project__XJ-PU_V12.html


Drew
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubblemaker,

Ignore this post, because I know nothing about this kind of change, and I know nothing about that Jag front end.

Something to consider?: that Jag's "curb weight" was/is about 3,800 lbs; and, a 3100 would be about 4,800 lbs.

How do you intend to use your truck? As a car (people carrier) or as a truck (load carrier)? If you will be carrying full truck loads, will the Jag parts be safe/strong enough?

Good luck with your conversion. Let us know how you progress (links to photos would be nice).

Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
I'm just going to be using it as a car... No heavy loads.

Good point though


Now the proud owner of a '51 Chevy 3100
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
Given the fact there are hundreds if not thousands of these trucks running Mustang 2 based front IFS and a fair few with the Jaguar set-ups I would happily fit a Jaguar.

It certainly looks considerably more substantial than those pressed steel F*rd offerings,my friend had a second series 1956 Task Force truck on Jag gear and it drove beautifully.

I DO agree with Tim though,if you were to use it primarily as Chevy intended as a load lugger,leaving it stock would ultimately be better.

There's a XJ Sport for sale in my village that's caught my eye,only £500 for the whole car.
(I reckon I could get it cheaper too) grin

Last edited by jockbolter50; 08/26/2015 8:54 AM.

1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
4
'Bolter
'Bolter
4 Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
As you're in Scotland, one thing to consider might be the parts availability of any front end you choose to use. Don't want your truck laid up for weeks waiting for parts...


1946 GMC Pickup - S-10 Frame, 455 Buick, TH400, original patina.

My 46 GMC on Photobucket
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by jockbolter50
Given the fact there are hundreds if not thousands of these trucks running Mustang 2 based front IFS and a fair few with the Jaguar set-ups I would happily fit a Jaguar.

It certainly looks considerably more substantial than those pressed steel F*rd offerings,my friend had a second series 1956 Task Force truck on Jag gear and it drove beautifully.

I DO agree with Tim though,if you were to use it primarily as Chevy intended as a load lugger,leaving it stock would ultimately be better.

There's a XJ Sport for sale in my village that's caught my eye,only £500 for the whole car.
(I reckon I could get it cheaper too) grin
£500 you say??? Tell me more


Now the proud owner of a '51 Chevy 3100
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
B
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by jockbolter50
Given the fact there are hundreds if not thousands of these trucks running Mustang 2 based front IFS and a fair few with the Jaguar set-ups I would happily fit a Jaguar.

It certainly looks considerably more substantial than those pressed steel F*rd offerings,my friend had a second series 1956 Task Force truck on Jag gear and it drove beautifully.

I DO agree with Tim though,if you were to use it primarily as Chevy intended as a load lugger,leaving it stock would ultimately be better.

There's a XJ Sport for sale in my village that's caught my eye,only £500 for the whole car.
(I reckon I could get it cheaper too) grin
£500 you say??? Tell me more


Now the proud owner of a '51 Chevy 3100
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
I agree about the comparison to a Mustang II, which ranged for 2,600-3,600 lbs.

Any Jag was most likely rated higher than a Mustang II (and be more plentiful in Europe). Oh, and it is a Jag (giving a certain/special "cachet" to it)

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
Originally Posted by Bubblemaker
£500 you say??? Tell me more

Castle Garage Services,3 Drybridge Road,Dundonald. 01563 851125.


1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,750
Originally Posted by tclederman
I agree about the comparison to a Mustang II, which ranged for 2,600-3,600 lbs.

Any Jag was most likely rated higher than a Mustang II (and be more plentiful in Europe). Oh, and it is a Jag (giving a certain/special "cachet" to it)

They do reckon the Jag rode just as smoothly as that other prestige Brit,the Rolls Royce but with less financial outlay.....and yes,big cats are cheap and plentiful here.

Basically everyone wants 50+mpg Eurobox puddle jumpers here now. grin


1950 Chevy Advance Design 3100 in Scotland
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Flickr.
I've definately got this truck thing in my blood ... my DNA sequence has torque settings
"Of all the small nations of this earth,perhaps only the ancient Greeks surpass the Scots in their contribution to mankind" Winston Churchill.

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.189s Queries: 14 (0.105s) Memory: 0.6443 MB (Peak: 0.7351 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 15:41:03 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS