The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (WICruiser, TexasA&M48Truck), 146 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,081
Posts1,055,959
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1114530 07/19/2015 6:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
Which end of the tie rod should have the reverse thread - driver or passenger side?


52 3100 project
54 3100 / 3112 ice cream truck, next project
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
It doesn't matter. The tie rod ends are only relative to the tie rod it self.
Although you typically want to keep the nuts to the back.
dg

Last edited by Denny Graham; 07/19/2015 2:06 PM.

Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
Yes, I believe so. Ha, ha. Honestly I don't know that it would make any difference in this type of front end.
Jon


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 914
3
'Bolter
'Bolter
3 Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 914
It will work either way though it does matter If my memory is not wrong.

For when doing an alignment and you are adjusting toe when you need to bring both wheels in you should be moving both adjustment turns in the same direction. If moving the LF wheel in by moving the wrench to the front of the auto moving the RF wheel should have you move the wrench forward as well.

Though my disclaimer is it has been a long time since I did an alignment and never on a 1952 or 1954 Chevrolet truck.


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Originally Posted by 32vld
It will work either way though it does matter If my memory is not wrong.

For when doing an alignment and you are adjusting toe when you need to bring both wheels in you should be moving both adjustment turns in the same direction. If moving the LF wheel in by moving the wrench to the front of the auto moving the RF wheel should have you move the wrench forward as well.

Though my disclaimer is it has been a long time since I did an alignment and never on a 1952 or 1954 Chevrolet truck.
I agree with Denny regarding orientation.

Regarding the adjustment:

If you are adjusting toe-in, you simply loosen the nuts on both tie rod ends and put a monkey wrench on the middle of the tie-rod and rotate the tie-rod.

1947-55 (and other years) toe-in adjustment

You are then either moving both sides inwards at the same time or both sides outwards at the same time (for either more toe-in or for more toe-out).

(Maybe I am mis-reading this thread - sorry.)

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
I see how it would not matter for adjustment; just wanted to know if there is a standard way. Can anybody check their threads?

The new style tie rod ends came with zerks facing one way and the nuts facing oppposite (though the nuts could be switched around).


52 3100 project
54 3100 / 3112 ice cream truck, next project
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
I'm re-doing the front end in my 1952 half-ton and using the same new style tie rod ends. I thought about this since you asked (and I answered) this morning, but for the life of me I can not imagine how it would make any difference. In fact, I can't tell you how my old tie rod came out. As for the zerks, I'm just swapping the nuts to make the zerks easier to access. I have the same problem (inaccessible zerk) in a couple of other places.
Jon


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 127
So which way are the zerks facing on yours? Mine are facing forward at the moment but it is a frame only, so cant tell how access will be with sheet metal on.


52 3100 project
54 3100 / 3112 ice cream truck, next project
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,484
Mine are facing toward the rear, but it would be just as easy to flip the tie rod and make them face to the front.
Jon


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,671
Logic says that if possible a grease fitting or threaded end of
a bolt would best be on the back side to minimize the chance of
being hit by something in the roadway or field.

dg


Denny G
Sandwich, IL
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
it only matters if you order one side and its wrong , Left thread is left side.


Dave Chapman
The Hollister Road Company
713-937-0387
[email protected]
www.hollisterroad.com
www.thoroco.com

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0