Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Youngin' Tut 59, latroca52, Donf, Lightholder's Dad, Jon G, Hanks custodian, 55shaker),
73
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,185 Posts1,057,284 Members48,467 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 | Just bought a 53 1/2 ton frame, I think? Looks like it is an ad frame, still has the rear end, springs, drive shaft, and front end on. Any markings I can look for to be certain? Our 53 doesn't sit on an ad frame, so I can't look there. Anybody got a nice picture of an original frame? | | | | | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 438 | Coach- I'm not aware of any specific markings that would distinguish it among the AD years. There are suspension and drivetrain features that would distinguish a 1/2 ton from heavier duty applications. Although not a pic of a full frame, take a look at my frame donor photos and compare. Note that these include some post-graft photos, so the Nova rear end will not resemble your own drivetrain. Another source might be Tom Brownell's book How to Restore Your Chevrolet Pickup. Good luck! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | coach,
I have never heard of a code/marking/ID on a '53 frame (but would be interested to hear if there is one). Of the parts you listed, the rear end is the only part with an ID. Try to find the casting numbers and post themn here. Then, at least the rear-end can be identified, but that is not going to provide a definitive ID of the date of the frame.
What front-end parts are still on the frame?
Tim | | | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 86 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 86 | He is a partial frame picture of my 53 3100. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 | It's in the single digits here today. I will look for some of the things you guys mentioned when it warms up. Thanks!! | | | | | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | A couple of things can get you narrowed down to the '53 model year or later. I can provide pictures if you would like.
The drag link is a non-adjustable type (i.e. no cotter pin and big screw in cap to preload spring) This was carried forward through '55 first series trucks. Also different are the spindles and I believe the steering arm. Most obvious difference is the lack of adjusters on the drag link.
I believe the rest of the frame is the same as those trucks back to 1950 (first year of tube shocks)
I am pretty sure brake line arrangement for '53 is new as well. There is a block attached to the back of the master cylinder with two tubes attached instead of 1 as in previous years.
That should narrow it down to pre '53 or post '53 | | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 623 "MONGO" | | "MONGO" Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 623 | Don't know if this will help or not but one difference I know of with Pre 54 and Post 54 frames was the kickup over the rear wheels was about 2" shorter on the later trucks due to the new flat side beds that were a little deeper. I traced these on a piece of cardboard to compare when I was thinking about going with a 54 style bed on my 51'. [img] http://www.chevygmcofkc.org/Gallery/data/3002/1FrameComparison.jpg[/img] MONGO | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | Coach,
Another obvious difference between '54 and '53-and-earlier 1/2 ton frames is there is no transmission-mount frame cross-member in '54. Also, the crossmember for the rear motor mounts in the '54 is at a different angle than the cross member in '53-and-earlier (different rear motor mounts, too).
Tim | | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 866 | There is a transmission mount crossmember! So it must be pre-54, right! I will check it out very carefully tomorrow, suppose to be in the 30"s. Thanks All1 | | |
| |