The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (GMCJammer51, IHPWR, DJHobbit'46Chevy, Danielbolt, Dragsix, RBs36, 2 invisible), 556 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,296
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1094523 03/29/2015 10:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 219
5
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
5 Offline
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 219
Pretty simple question I guess...

283s were used in series 3-10 trucks (though 348 was also an option)
So how did a 283 pull a Spartan 70 or Viking 60 hauling a trailer or an otherwise heavy load? Hard to fathom when your looking at a modern CAT powered tractor next to a 283 powered tractor.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
I drove back in those days. It was simple. You kept it in a gear where you were turning about 4,000 RPM. We depended on RPM instead of torque back in those days. But we got the job done. This is why I think it is so stupid when I hear buys worrying about their engines coming apart at over 2500 RPM. I would have fired a driver for lugging an engine at 2500 RPM.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,675
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,675
Horsepower = Torque X RPM divided by 5252

The basic idea was to pick a gear that let the engine develop its maximum horsepower and keep the engine turning in that RPM range more or less constantly. Then the only consideration would be whether the gear we selected would get us there on schedule without too many speeding tickets.

Bigger, higher-torque engines just allowed lower RPM and/or fewer shifts. The little 283 with a 3" stroke and virtually no low-end torque needed a LOT of gears!
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,189
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,189
My 1956 8400 has a 21,000 GVW rating and it started out in life with a 265 V8. It made a wopping 155 hp @ 4200 rpm...they did a lot with a little back then!

Mike B smile


Mike Boteler

1956 Chevy 3100 Resto Rod
1956 8400 Wrecker w/Holmes 525
1956 9200 Tractor w/Allison Automatic
1952 Willys M38 Army Jeep
1953 Willys M38A1 Fire Jeep
1978 Jeep CJ-5 Navy Jeep
1984 Jeep CJ7
+++++
Hughesville, MD
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
How about the old 235 babbit rod Stovebolt sixes. before the v-8 came out. You were lucky to get 20K miles out of one.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262

before the v-8 AND before the high-pressure 235s

But, this post was about the 283?

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 219
5
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
5 Offline
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 219
Thanks gents, great info! Crenwelge it is pretty cool that you drove a rig like that. It is really amazing how that little engine got things done. Even more so with the 235s.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
Originally Posted by tclederman
before the v-8 AND before the high-pressure 235s

But, this post was about the 283?
I thought it was a little added trivia.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 37
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 37
Until the last 30 years even most trucks couldnt run with the traffic.You didnt worry so much about time and speed as you did just geting there.I have drove alot of trucks were on hills you would down shift until you were in second gear thinking what if i have to go to first and what if first wont do it but luckly i never had to go to first on the highway.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262

I ran with the state main-road traffic in the early seventies (1954 3106 with 235 and 3.90 rear-end).

My 1948 with 216 and 4.11 rear-end 3105 never got the chance to drive on an interstate (late 60s) and I doubt if I ever took it over 55mph.


Moderated by  69Cuda, Super55 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.585s Queries: 14 (0.081s) Memory: 0.6389 MB (Peak: 0.7236 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 20:47:43 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS