| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (TUTS 59, RLB),
121
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,080 Posts1,055,954 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 434 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 434 | Once you work under a 2 post lift, you won't consider anything else. You can do everything from brakes to transmissions. I'm 70 years old and spent many years under a single post and a drive on lift. The drive on lifts were just like a 4 post lift is now, but with a single air over hydraulic ram. I always wondered If I wouldn't be just as well off with an end jack and a creeper. Rotary was the old reliable brand, but there are other good ones out there, But I would stay away from cheap Chinese stuff. If a jack falls, you should have had jack stands on it. If a lift falls, and some of them do, you can hope you are quick enough to get out of the way.
I have been looking at a Mohawk 20,000. Our day cabs weigh about 14k and our sleepers about 16k, but I'm not sure where my lift points would land with the fuel tanks. It sure would be nice for my GMC 550s and my 600 GMC with a 525 Holmes. The Mohawks are the Cadillac of lifts.
R-Bo
1959 Apache 1/2 ton Big Window, Short bed Fleetside (under reconstruction) 1966 GMC 305V6 in the family
| | | |
Entire Thread
|
First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 12/17/2013 12:37 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Grigg | 12/17/2013 5:29 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| 1958GMCnut | 12/17/2013 6:00 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| crenwelge | 12/17/2013 6:51 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| R-Bo | 12/18/2013 6:30 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Denny Graham | 12/17/2013 10:19 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| MNSmith | 12/17/2013 3:03 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Hollow65 | 12/18/2013 6:52 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Grigg | 12/18/2013 2:49 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 01/03/2014 12:25 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| don stocker | 01/03/2014 10:10 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Allen Lane | 01/03/2014 3:02 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Grigg | 01/03/2014 5:03 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Allen Lane | 01/03/2014 5:17 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Grigg | 01/04/2014 12:36 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 01/05/2014 1:05 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Allen Lane | 01/05/2014 3:14 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 01/06/2014 2:42 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Hollow65 | 01/07/2014 5:55 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Allen Lane | 01/08/2014 4:50 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Hollow65 | 01/08/2014 1:14 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Grigg | 01/08/2014 1:23 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Allen Lane | 01/14/2014 4:14 AM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 01/23/2014 11:12 PM |
Re: First, but not the last!
| Farmone | 02/09/2014 9:46 PM | |
| |
| |