Originally Posted by bartamos
64Fleet: Who makes a "bolt in" improved front suspension for 1959 Chevy Truck 34" frame? You Mean the donor truck method from a 73-87? That conversion is not "bolt in" either. Next part not directed at anyone, just my opinion: That's the problem, they are cut, fab, narrow and weld. Would you pay a lot of money for a truck with a front end swap done by who knows who? that who knows what? What about weld strength and what kind of geometry, symmetry and alignment was adhered to? It's not a job for a back yard, wrought iron gate builder. You don't do it with a 120V mig. The therapy you get might be physical therapy at the hospital. In the 55-59 Truck Manual, there is a section on welding to those frames. Very specific warnings and methods. Most add on front suspension kits use boxing, these old original frames are not to be boxed, they are meant to twist, engineered to twist. Boxing is for hot rods. Everybody thinks boxing like Chip Foose, makes you go faster. They are trying to make the frame stronger because the load is transferred from a spread load at leaf spring hangers to a point load at the A arm. In my opinion the way to go is a complete chassis like a Fatman chassis, built and engineered from scratch. About $8500.
http://www.fatmanfabrications.co/products/1955-1959-chevy-truck-chassis/
Not bad mouthing someone who wants to have a car ride with the cool look of an old truck, they are Stovebolters too. But have seen too many butchered, unsafe at 70 MPH, jobs. I've looked at many for sale.

This is why I am a believer in complete chassis swaps. The chassis and front and rear suspension and brakes are all designed to operate together. The suspension is much better than the original, as are the brakes. I plan to put 5-10K KM's on my truck a year (minimum), and engineering has much improved since 1946 in the way of suspension and brakes.


1946 GMC Pickup - S-10 Frame, 455 Buick, TH400, original patina.

My 46 GMC on Photobucket