| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
0 members (),
256
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,149 Posts1,056,818 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#83698 10/03/2007 12:41 PM | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | I am in process of building my '48 3100. Engine will be a V8 with a T5 behind it with either 3.42 or 3.08 gearing. What are the limitations in cooling with the stock sized radiator? Is there a better radiator core from those who have BTDT?
My concern is the heat rejection from the V8 will be more than triple that of the original 216 simply because the engine output will be triple. To me the square area of the stock radiator is a little on the small side. Since the engine heat generated while cruising will be minimal as the truck will only require 10-15hp to maintain speed, my concern is slow traffic, stop-and-go traffic, and towing. Thicker cores will only help to a slight degree as after 4 rows, the radiator efficiency starts to drop. Even a staggered core rad will loose efficiency after 5 rows. The other thougth was to have a large surge tank to act as reservoir to extend the time it takes to heat the coolant to boil in a slow traffic / high load period.
Can anyone comment.
Scott
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | |
| |
| |