| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (Tronman, TUTS 59, cmayna, Otto Skorzeny, UnclePaddy, Steelonsteel, Peggy M, 2 invisible),
78
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,042 Posts1,055,505 Members48,424 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | bzt, I think you hit the nail on the head. That's about the best reason they could have left the had throttle on the trucks. And as Chris mentioned, I've always though it was a throw over from the days before they had carbs with fast idle cams and I'm sure it was used for that. I can only think that using it as a cruise control would be akin to lighting a match over the filler neck to see how much gas is in your tank. Bad idea in my book!
I often hear people complain about the throttle cable not staying set when they pull it out. My personal feeling is that the replacement return springs as opposed to the original spring puts way to much tension on the linkage and that's what pulls the cable back in. It’s been several years since I’ve had a W-1 on the bench but if I remember correctly the accelerator pump spring holds the throttle open on them. Prior to 1950 the W-1 was used by Chevy and the return spring tension required for the W-1 would have been greater than for the post 1949 Rochester ‘B’. The vendors now sell a one-size-fits-all return spring and I think it just puts to much tension on the linkage.
Denny Graham Sandwich, IL
Last edited by Denny Graham; 01/30/2012 2:07 PM.
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | |
| |
| |