| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,111 Posts1,056,244 Members48,437 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#75719 03/30/2007 5:23 PM | Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 43 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 43 | Here I go again. I thought I'd try a 2004r behind my 62/261 truck, but I returned the trans, it was rotten inside (water). I looked iver that project and decided to simplify things a little. Now I have a line in a 93 t5 (1352-216)and with my 3.38 rear and a .86 OD. it sould be pretty good. Am I wrong in assuming that this trans will only require the same massaging as the 83-87 t5's? Its reasonable enough in price and it's a WC? so I can afford to get a speed adapter for it. This will also cure the error created when I went from 3.90 to 3.38. What do you think? | | |
|
|
| |
