| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,042 Posts1,055,519 Members48,424 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 295 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 295 | Agree he is not doing expansive cooling.
I beg to differ regarding pipe size I agree the volume to circumferance is not favorable with larger pipe ie vol goes up by the square of radius change BUT the velocity is inversely proportional to the area so what you lose on one hand you gain on the other. With larger pipe size you get slower velocity thus longer contact time AND more surface area.
He would be much better off by using multi tube heat exchanger water cooled than with single tube but there just may be a cost factor involved which I tried to keep in mind.
dan Bentler | | |
| |
| |