| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Phak1, ShopRag, Mr Bailey, Woodcmiami, Otto Skorzeny, Biermann, 78buckshot, DadsFirstPickup),
87
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,147 Posts1,056,801 Members48,454 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 9,671 | This paint that I’m talking about is what Chevrolet used in 1954 on the interior of their trucks, pearl beige and the grays they used on their hubcaps and bumpers.
I don’t think they had Imron in 1954 Dan and I’ve never stripped any so I don’t know how it would react to Aircraft Stripper.
I don’t know what lead carbonate in the paint would have to do with stripper not working on the binder. The lead was a pigment and although it’s been banned for domestic use it’s still used in a lot of paints commercially. And Richard, I’m not disputing what you say about the baking enamel; I have for years baked my store bought enamel paint (non baking enamel) in my “big old wife’s” oven, (when she’s out for the day that is.) And I’ve never noticed that it made it any tougher than air-drying it, I do it because it dries faster and I can handle it sooner. I’ve done it with Rustoleum and other enamels that I’ve used on the ’50.
I don’t seem to be getting any closer to learning why this stuff is so impervious to the ethylene chloride compared to other paints I’ve stripped. DG
Denny G Sandwich, IL
| | |
| |
| |