Dave (53 Money pit)
First off, thanks for replying! I am always open to new ideas on this project, but I want to stay with the stovebolt engine. The reason for this is because I collect cars; already have several stovebolts, and what I do to cars is more for me than for everyone else... ya know? An example for both would be in this particular vehicle the 3speed power assisted column shifted transmission from the factory and the remote tuned from the steering column 6 tube shortwave radio. Hence my desire for a separate 6v system. In the last few years I have brought all the systems back up from the gas gauge to the separate heater and defroster blower motors. I decided to worry about the engine last.I prefer to restore the vehicle, then modify it. The MSD and HID systems are more modern than their predecessors but can be fitted as to not contrast with the integrity and dignity of a 70 year old car. For instance, the MSD control box will run off of a conventional CD ignition, box can be mounted inside behind firewall,and much quicker starting, smoother idle and improved fuel economy are the result, and HID lighting comes in a range from 3000-22000 K so the original color hue of 4000-5500k can be used and the result will be, simply, 'much brighter light' without the ricer color and hue.
In the end,I believe that I will be building a 235 or 261 (or is it 262) because of the fully pressurized oil system and hydraulic lifters. 150 brake horsepower versus 80 just by choosing that long block is probably the most cost effective upgrade. Maybe fuel injection, maybe not. that depends on what the 'feel' will be.
I may have addressed other members insights/concerns in this reply by accident as I read thru all the responses before beginning to reply. If so, Dave, I apologize. What have your experiences been with the stovebolts? power-band? reliability? characteristics?
Last edited by MasterDelukse; 10/12/2010 6:15 PM. Reason: wrong handle
