| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Nick in Manitou, GMCJammer51, 68ironhead, Ridgeback, 66flea, 3B, KEVINSKI, 1 invisible),
99
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,169 Posts1,057,033 Members48,458 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#66351 09/27/2006 4:09 AM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 | The SBC rod has the same problem as the BOP rods. The crank end is too narrow. Custom forged rods would be $$$$$. The exception to that might be if a forged BOP rod had enough width on the forging to do a 1.050 crank end. The idea was to run a forged rod and a cast piston, and get 10.0 plus compression. Which is about the cost of a set forged pistons. The next over bore would only require a set of cast pistons, half the cost of forged.
This is going to be a street motor. The high compression is to run E85 not set record times. The way I work it out E85 sells for 20-30% less than gas. Running E85 you loose 20-30% in mpg.. Considering consumer economics and physics the fore going will be a constant. For every 2 points you raise your compression you gain 8% in performance and 7% efficiency or is it mpg. The stock 292 is 8.0:1 raise it to 12.0:1 and gain 14% in mpg. The extra 16% performance is a freebie. :rolleyes:
There is another way to accomplish the same thing . Install a centrifugal blower, Paxton, ATI, Vortech what ever.
Larry
I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink. | | |
| |
| |