| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,090 Posts1,056,016 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,922 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,922 | Emotionally, I'm all for an L6, but towing shortens my temper quite a bit (try to pull out and pass on a grade). If the gearing is tall and transmission ratios wide, a 292 may very well have better torque than a V8 - at the RPM range you're in (that's where the comparison has some validity: the peak torque per inch isn't too much different, but the "mildness" of the L6 leaves it down where you can use it without down-shifting). My 1/2 ton Chevy 292 3-on-the-tree amazed me at how well it felt in traffic - no need for revs, just ease the clutch out and press down. The more power you try to get out of anything by any method (except high compression or displacement increase) moves the power away from your cruising RPM, and as it gets hotter the low speed power is significantly worse than stock. A truck is tall enough to accept a 4200 (very tall engine - too much for most cars), but it's about 275 hp, and they're cheap enough but the EFI and spark have to be bought ($$$) or fabricated. They're also ugly as sin. There are no car-size (under 800 lbs.) L6 engines out there bigger than the Ford 300, so displacement is always a problem. | | | |
Entire Thread
|
Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| C10Apache1960 | 02/11/2010 5:24 PM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| OldSub | 02/11/2010 6:11 PM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| KC in NH | 02/11/2010 6:14 PM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| Avette4me | 02/12/2010 1:06 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| chevman32 | 02/12/2010 2:49 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| panic | 02/12/2010 4:22 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| Scott Danforth | 02/12/2010 4:47 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| BILL | 02/12/2010 4:30 PM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| panic | 02/12/2010 6:42 PM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| OldSub | 02/13/2010 12:58 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| hoggyrubber | 02/13/2010 5:40 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| padresag | 02/13/2010 7:02 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| 54daddy | 02/23/2010 1:14 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| Scott Danforth | 02/13/2010 1:03 AM |
Re: Stovebolt vs, Small Block V*
| LONGBOX55 | 02/13/2010 2:14 AM | |
| |
| |