Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,010 Posts1,055,308 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | True, Chevy would not have used the 394, but GMC may have since they were using the 371. If they did, it would have been '59, which was the first year for that engine in passenger car use. As far as the 322 goes,by '58/'59, it had been relegated to School Bus use, as the 348 replaced it in all other applications. Did a little checking in the Standard catalog of American V8s, couldn't come up with anything specific about Olds engines in GMCs, and it was a bit fuzzy about 409s. Could only get truck specific casting numbers '62-'62 for the '09.
Bill Burmeister | | | |
Entire Thread
|
Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/11/2009 10:17 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| Builder | 12/11/2009 10:20 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/11/2009 10:34 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/12/2009 1:12 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 53moneypit | 12/12/2009 6:02 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/12/2009 6:32 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| padresag | 12/12/2009 6:59 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/12/2009 7:25 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| padresag | 12/13/2009 12:12 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/13/2009 1:49 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 3B | 12/13/2009 2:13 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/13/2009 2:25 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| don stocker | 12/13/2009 3:28 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/13/2009 3:28 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| padresag | 12/13/2009 3:30 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/13/2009 3:40 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| padresag | 12/13/2009 5:05 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/13/2009 5:42 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| OldSub | 12/13/2009 5:57 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| tclederman | 12/13/2009 11:25 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/13/2009 10:42 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| Crabbyappleton | 12/13/2009 11:04 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| 1959ChevyApache | 12/13/2009 11:25 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| padresag | 12/13/2009 11:52 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| OldSub | 12/14/2009 1:03 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| don stocker | 12/15/2009 2:44 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| LONGBOX55 | 12/15/2009 3:13 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| Crabbyappleton | 12/16/2009 9:28 AM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| Builder | 12/16/2009 3:36 PM |
Re: Trademaster, Taskmaster, or Workmaster?
| tclederman | 12/16/2009 4:34 PM | |
| |