Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,143 Posts1,056,495 Members48,442 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | " . . . he's got a 1961 engine? By that time, all the 235 blocks were set up for hydraulic lifters. Putting a solid lifter cam in an engine designed for hydraulics- - - -might as well install kerosene headlights and a crank, too! . . . "Jerry, Are you saying that a solid cam in a 58-62 (235 and 261) block is a recipe for problems or it is not appropriate? Those blocks were not designed just for hydraulics; they were designed for cars (hydraulic lifters) and for trucks (mechanical/solid lifters). It should be noted that the the 1958 and later Truck Shop Manuals warn about not using the older-style mechanical lifters in 58-62 blocks, A new style of mechanical/solid lifters had to be used in 58-62 truck blocks (blocks that were designed for use with either mechanical or hydraulic lifters). Tim | | | |
Entire Thread
|
mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/18/2009 1:04 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| baldeagle | 09/18/2009 1:56 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/18/2009 2:26 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| baldeagle | 09/18/2009 2:46 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| panic | 09/18/2009 3:45 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| LONGBOX55 | 09/18/2009 3:53 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| tclederman | 09/18/2009 12:06 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Hotrod Lincoln | 09/18/2009 12:52 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Pre '68 Dave | 09/18/2009 3:22 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/18/2009 5:03 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| ApacheFiend | 09/18/2009 8:52 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/18/2009 10:38 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| tclederman | 09/20/2009 8:18 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/20/2009 11:40 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| tclederman | 09/22/2009 3:12 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/22/2009 3:50 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| bowtietim | 09/22/2009 4:23 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| LONGBOX55 | 09/22/2009 4:33 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/22/2009 1:31 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| tclederman | 09/22/2009 2:03 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/22/2009 6:46 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Oilrag | 09/23/2009 1:39 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| rednate | 09/23/2009 3:02 AM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Pre '68 Dave | 09/22/2009 3:23 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Hotrod Lincoln | 09/22/2009 4:34 PM |
Re: mo questions, mo questions, mo questions
| Pre '68 Dave | 09/22/2009 5:17 PM | |
| |