| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (IHPWR),
32
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,024 Posts1,055,395 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 | As usual for me the more I measure the more questions come up. I checked a couple engines and find an average piston top to deck value of .062” to .065”. Removing .060” there and .030” off the head sound like too much and now I wonder if the zero decking process is intended to replace head milling instead of being used with it at least in this case. I realize there will be valve train geometry issues but those aside at what point does reducing combustion chamber volume become overdone for a street engine? Thanks for replies.
1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod You Tube | | |
|
|
| |
