| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Hotrod Lincoln),
104
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,089 Posts1,056,004 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 76 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 76 | Hi Coal - I did almost the same thing with my '64 C20. It was originally a 292 3 speed on the column. The motor was really tired so when we did the rebuild we used "propane" pistons, added a very mild cam, Clifford 4 bl intake and Hedman headers. (He's "Otis" in the Gallery.) We also changed the 3 speed to a 5 speed and it works great as a driver. We do tow a trailer with our '56 Chevy on it and it does OK - it works hard on hills or fighting strong winds. When we put the engine together I had a 465 cfm Holley carb that I figured would be pretty close to what it would need so thats what we ran it with. It ran OK but seemed a little weak at lower rpm and didn't seem to have "crisp" throttle response. The plugs looked really white but I was thinking maybe they were a heat range too hot. On a whim I tried a different carb. I had a box stock Edlebrock 600 which I figured would be too much for it but thought I'd see what it would do. I was amazed. It ran MUCH better - throttle response was better it would pull from low rpm better and the plugs were tan. I know that on paper that is way too big a carb for that engine - I also know the engine runs way better than it did with the smaller carb and the fuel mileage is the same. For what it's worth... | | |
| |
| |