| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,066 Posts1,055,876 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#36304 08/05/2004 4:01 AM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 248 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 248 | Interesting observation/comment Fred.... the 216 did not have steam holes from block to head....
For some reason they seemed to trap heat/steam in the upper recesses of the head..... and of course steam is not a good coolant as liquid water is...
According to the GM 1942 military shop manuals the military was privileged with the early ethelene glycol antifreeze similar to today's brew but no doubt not as exotic. They relied on single weight oil for the crankcase and added gasoline or kerosene to the crtankaces before shutting down the engine to dilute the viscosity. On start up you were instructed to fast idle for 30 minutes to boil off the dilution liquids(gas or kerosene) before getting under way and/or pulling heavy loads. Dilution rate of 8 ounces at 0F and 16 ounces at -40F....
...and trucks had no heaters....initially... then they got wise and retro fitted a lot of them...
By the way the line venting to the Rad tank varied from 1/8 copper to 3/8 rubber hose.... some with a 1/4 turn valve and others without.
If I can find all the right brass fittings, I may plumb my 261 to look more like the old 216....
Any other suggestions or pratical experience with that contraption?????
Bob C.
Bob C. CMP Heaven The Hammond Barn
| | |
| |
| |