| |
Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Phak1, TUTS 59, Hambone, dunfire, Otto Skorzeny, baldeagle, Rusty Heaps),
43
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,004 Posts1,055,246 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,660 Curmudgeon | | Curmudgeon Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,660 | That's interesting. Never really thought about it before.
The Internet says a typical modern spark plug has around 500 to 3000 ohms. 500 ohms new and increases as it ages. Modern spark plug wires have between 10,000 to 12,000 ohms (typically). A solid copper or aluminum core wire would have a few ohms or less. So a lot less resistance (500 ohms versus 10,500 ohms for example) means a lot higher current through the parts along it's pathway. It takes voltage to fire a spark plug (around 3000 volts). It takes voltage to jump the gap from the rotor button to each cap electrode. So the increased current (more than needed) would negatively affect the parts that move and parts that arc, more than the others. The other parts would have to dissipate more heat.
I think Jerry's statement has some merit.
"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use." "I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM." | | |
| |
| |