| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
9 members (Wayne67vert, DaveV, Phak1, Eisenholtz, Ponchogl, Bill Hanlon, 55shaker, Rusty Rod, TUTS 59),
159
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,049 Posts1,055,546 Members48,425 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | There are two stud sizes I am aware of, 3/8 which is what most stock pressed in studs are and 7/16 which are found in higher performance engines and are generally of the screw in type. You can retrofit heads from 3/8 to 7/16. There is no performance gain associated with the stud size that I can determine. The rocker ratio determines how long the valves stay open and care has to be taken to ensure an increase in the ratio does not cause a valve to contact the piston. I do not claim to be an expert on this so I would suggest doing a google search for more detailed information. Unless you are building your small block to a high compression configuration the 1:52 rockers would be more than adequate for your needs. I am using them inconjuction with an Edelbrock performer cam in my 350.
This style of roller rocker does not need periodic adjustment. There are some others which may if used in a mechanical lifter valve train. The hydraulic lifters do not require this adjustment once they are set correctly. | | |
| |
| |