| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,059 Posts1,055,818 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 | Yes, it almost certainly is a heat exchanger as John said. Engine coolant would flow through one set of connections without going anywhere else. The other pair of connections would be plumbed to the fire pump with heater size hoses to cool the engine. It is useless on a truck without a pump and generally a trouble spot for leaks.
If you do not have a fire pump, get rid of it. If you do have a fire pump, get rid of it. It will be a constant source of leaks and of no operational value unless you pump for a long time at a big fire. I am gonna guess that is unlikely.
Mac :{)
1962 K10 short step side, much modified for rally 1969 T50 fire truck, almost nos, needs a few things
| | |
| |
| |