| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (TexasJim50, 55shaker, Guitplayer, Bill Hanlon, cmayna, Peggy M, sron48, jmoore),
166
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,259 Posts1,058,292 Members48,485 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 788 | I had the '63 C10 with the stock 283. I loved it. Those engines are nearly indestructible. I drove that thing all over the Western United States while in the military. I miss that truck
I also have a '62 C10 that had the 230 I6 in it when I bought it. Good running motor. When it died (nylon facing on timing gears gave out) I had a '67 327 sitting in the garage, so I dropped that in. Not truly Period Correct since the C10s didn't get a 327 until 1966, but they did exist in other cars. It's one of the few compromises I have made on authenticity. With the stock 3.90 gears and the SM420 tranny, torque has not been an issue for me. I have trouble keeping the rear end straight on wet roads, but I have plenty of power when I need it. I have been able to break the tires loose in the first 3 gears, just never saw the need to try for fourth. I prefer to just drive it in a straight line and let others wonder why an old truck is still on the road.
In my opinion, I would rebuild what you have and make a great runner out of it. There's nothing wrong with the 235 I6 engine. To change that to a V8, you would need to swap the bell housing ( I see you already have that) and I think you will need to scrounge up the front mounts for the V8. I may be wrong, but I'm not sure if the I6 front mount is the same as the V8. I know others on this forum will correct me if that is wrong. perhaps you had a 235 in there instead of a 230. 235 was the orig eng for a 62 ron | | |
| |
| |