| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Nick in Manitou, GMCJammer51, 68ironhead, Ridgeback, 66flea, 3B, KEVINSKI, 1 invisible),
99
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,169 Posts1,057,033 Members48,458 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 | I have also spent a lot of dyno time with sbc and had the same results Jerry mentioned. Dynos had mass air flow sensors for years before cars and something I've noticed is larger exhaust kills some low end torque. Horsepower is not really affected till high rpm range. I think the loss of some exhaust scavaging with the large manifold is the reason since the maf sensor shows a drop compared to the smaller manifold. All the readings are so small that they are insignificant on a street engine.
Evan
| | |
| |
| |