| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,037 Posts1,055,466 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 122 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 122 | Am replacing a '37 216 with a '61 261 using the 37 bell hsg and '37 transmission to avoid messing with the driveshaft and rear end. The 261 flywheel forces me to update the clutch from the old 3 finger/carbon throwout to the newer diaphragm /throwout bearing arrangement. Got everything to fit EXCEPT I notice the new ('42 - '61) throwout fork is about 1/4" longer between the pivot ball and the fingers than the '37. This means that the fingers contact the throwout bearing 1/4" offset to the right of the vertical centerline of the engine flywheel. I followed Patricks instructions to a "t" and even called him of this concern to which he said there are hundreds of these conversions out there with no problems. I have no reason to doubt this fine gentleman who has done so much for us stovebolters and am wondering if this offset has gone undetected with no detrimental consequences. It is my intention to "give it a go" and was wondering if anyone else has noticed the analomy. Thanks in advance for any responses | | |
| |
| |