The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (klhansen, Lightholder's Dad, Ridgeback, qdub, Steelonsteel, joetravjr, mick53, 1 invisible), 561 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,291
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
C
Gabriel Sandoval
Gabriel Sandoval
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
Beautiful scenery and beautiful truck. Thanks for sharing.

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
C
Gabriel Sandoval
Gabriel Sandoval
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
Update 9-30-2020 : I finally got back to rebuilding my older “bigger” single barrel Rochester to put back on the 261 in my 1946 Chevy. Driving them back to back, I would say the Rochester has around 5-10% more horsepower at the top end. I put the Daytona Carburetor on my 235 Stovebolt in my 47 Fleetline and it is a perfect match. Same power output to me as the “regular” single barrel Rochester with the benefit of having a new Carburetor. As I mentioned before I’m very content with the Daytona performance. I’ll be doing a gas mileage test but I imagine it will be similar to the Rochester. I hope this info helps whoever is interested in these Carbs.
Attachments
63A9C4B7-C048-44B9-A5D9-202B17807E20.jpeg (201.47 KB, 390 downloads)
640687F8-C2D6-4CD8-917B-6CC2F60013D4.jpeg (210.51 KB, 386 downloads)
5C60A68A-A401-4459-AB5A-1BE4FDD134FE.jpeg (221.72 KB, 385 downloads)
CB3044CC-2B47-4DD9-A909-70A77B714CF0.jpeg (402.27 KB, 379 downloads)

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
A 235 would likely get 15 MPG if you dribbled gas down the carb out of a boot whether the bed was fully loaded down of empty.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
C
Gabriel Sandoval
Gabriel Sandoval
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
Greetings Carl. The 235 is actually in the Fleetline, and I was getting 14mps with the Rochester, I hope the Daytona will do a bit better. My 261 got 12mpg's with either Carb. Both are running great.

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Gabriel:

I realize this thread is over six months old, but I wanted to add my thanks to you for taking the time to post your experiences with the Daytona carburetor. Having been through (so far) 3 of the original Rochester B units, and having yet to find one which is not warped (and leaking), I have been searching for an alternative and I think the Daytona might be it for my '53 truck with its 216. I'll save the Rochesters for the next owner.


1953 Chevrolet 3104 1/2-Ton
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,504
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,504
Originally Posted by bajones238
Gabriel:

I realize this thread is over six months old, but I wanted to add my thanks to you for taking the time to post your experiences with the Daytona carburetor. Having been through (so far) 3 of the original Rochester B units, and having yet to find one which is not warped (and leaking), I have been searching for an alternative and I think the Daytona might be it for my '53 truck with its 216. I'll save the Rochesters for the next owner.

Ditto, I applaud the effort here to test it out.

I’m not sure any of us love the idea of modern aftermarket carbs. And clearly the Daytona isn’t a perfect solution from a design standpoint.

But keeping our old vehicles on the road for another couple decades is going to likely require some creativity and getting comfortable with less than ideal solutions. The supply of B’s in usable condition sucks. The proper YF is not super easy to source and the prices get higher each year.

Parallel example...I like to tinker around with chainsaws. Some OEM stuff like carbs and coils are getting mighty scarce or just don’t exist. Using aftermarket parts of questionable origin is just becoming a way of life. I don’t particularly like it...but it’s just the way it is.


1951 3100
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,112
'Bolter
'Bolter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,112
I just installed one of these on my 38 216. It runs perfectly and going by the plugs, in a very lean manner. It is basically a Zenith 28 and as I understand from my GMC shop manual, they were used on them in the early fifties. You could also get an adjustable high speed jet in those days for high altitude applications.


1951 GMC 1 Ton Flatbed -- It is finally on the road and what a great time I have driving it!
1951 1 Ton Completed


My Chevy Master 4 Door is on the Road!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
C
Gabriel Sandoval
Gabriel Sandoval
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
Hey truckerix! Sorry I hadn’t been to this thread for a while. I hope your carburetor is running well on your 216. I’ve had no problems with mine. My 235 is running great. Easy startup, great response, plenty of power. I couldn’t be happier. I’m glad this thread helped out as I’ve been helped out by others. I’ll have to come back with fuel economy updates once my engine is fully broken in. It’s not a daily driver so it’s taken a while. But no complaints on the carburetor.

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
C
Gabriel Sandoval
Gabriel Sandoval
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 173
Glad I could be of some help. The carburetor is running flawlessly, don’t have a single complaint. I hope yours is working out for you.

Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 151
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 151
I am considering purchasing one of these for the '54 235 that is in my project truck.

Cost and availability are a couple of reasons why I am considering using a Daytona carb and another main reason is that I live at over 7000 feet above sea level and I am under the impression that setting up the Daytona carburetor to function well at this altitude is supposed to be very simple.

Gabriel (or anyone else with experience with these carburetors on a 235), has your experience continued to be positive?

I am about to place an order as it is about time for a test start of my engine!

Thanks!


Nick
1940 KC Model 1/2 Ton Pickup Project
(with '37-'39 Bed and '46 Frame)
Taos, New Mexico
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 11
6
'Bolter
'Bolter
6 Offline
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 11
I have a universal carb from mikesCarbParts.
I have not had any issue. Except user error when I installed and made a big vacuum leak.

I originally got it because I was chasing power and other issues. Which, embarrassingly, I think was because my split exhaust was keeping the carb from going past 3/8 throttle… which I noticed after I put the universal in.

Also my engines were using a large oil filter, that bolted to intake and was always in my way and difficult to remove etc etc. all just excuses. I will probably put one of my Rochester back in some day… maybe.

No scientific data from me though.


62 c10 rebuilding it cheap
Family rust bucket 2of2
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.062s Queries: 16 (0.057s) Memory: 0.6450 MB (Peak: 0.7681 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 19:24:24 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS