The Stovebolt Page Forums Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Stovebolt Supporter!
Indianapolis

Fabrications

Talk to Randy Domeck

See what they

can do

for you
!


Stovebolt Site Search
 
Old Truck Calendars
Months of truck photos!
Nothing like an old truck calendar

Stovebolt Calendars

Some New
Some Vintage
Many in Production

Check for details!

Will be updating all year around!


Who's Online Now
29 registered members (carbking, Burgy, carryall jerry, 57 Apache Stock, Cablesmill, 2 invisible), 584 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics106,639
Posts833,964
Members39,822
Most Online940
Apr 5th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Ben5398, Daniel1964, Eddie1956, Freds50, hdpb, JoeMc, Josh_51GMC, retiredlafd, victorykingpin, Zach Q
Image Posting Policy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#838886 - Mon Mar 26 2012 10:41 PM 235 Intake Manifold  
fab51  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 364
Central Missouri
So, I'm probably overthinking things again...

Not too long ago, I picked up an Offenhauser dual carb intake, and was planning on using dual Carter YF's. After playing around with things recently, I've found that I don't have a good matched set of carbs. So, I've been wondering...

Did anyone ever produce an aluminum single carb intake, that would have better flow characteristics than the stock intake?

Which stock intake is better? I have a truck intake with the tall center section, but I also have a car intake with the short center section. Which one flows better?

I've about talked myself into staying with one, well tuned Carter YF. I just want to know which manifold will perform the best.

TIA thumbs_up


-Tim
'51 Chevy 3104 w/'56 235, 848 Head, HEI Dizzy, Corvette Cam & Split Manifold


#838917 - Tue Mar 27 2012 12:37 AM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: fab51]  
Pre '68 Dave  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,699
Snohomish,WA,USA
The difference in short and tall intake is not car v truck. The parts book shows pass and truck using the same intake. The tall was used up through 1958, then because the hood was lowered on the car line in 1959 the shorter intake was used.
As far as which flows better I doubt there is much difference although the rated HP went up in the later years. That most likely had nothing to do with the intake.
Both manifolds take a difference length throttle rod.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog

#839172 - Tue Mar 27 2012 10:48 PM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: Pre '68 Dave]  
fab51  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 364
Central Missouri
Too bad...I was kinda hoping I had something special. ohwell


-Tim
'51 Chevy 3104 w/'56 235, 848 Head, HEI Dizzy, Corvette Cam & Split Manifold

#839197 - Wed Mar 28 2012 12:17 AM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: fab51]  
mark50  Offline
New Guy
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13
San Francisco CA
I'm pretty sure Nicson made an aluminum single carb manifold. Did it flow better than a stock version? I have no idea. There was one on eBay a couple of months ago. I'm guessing it's rarer than their more common 2 x 1 manifolds as most guys installing an aftermarket manifold were looking for horsepower gains.



Moderated by  53moneypit, Woogeroo 

Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
#-->
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0