The Stovebolt Page Forums Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Stovebolt Supporter!
Indianapolis

Fabrications

Talk to Randy Domeck

See what they

can do

for you
!


Stovebolt Site Search
 
Old Truck Calendars
Months of truck photos!
Nothing like an old truck calendar

Stovebolt Calendars

Some New
Some Vintage
Many in Production

Check for details!

Will be updating all year around!


Who's Online Now
36 registered members (carbking, 32vld, bwilliams, CenCal53, carryall jerry, 2 invisible), 529 guests, and 6 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics106,686
Posts834,308
Members39,828
Most Online940
Apr 5th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
49chevy454, 61lorrie, Frantz, junebug909, Mark H, yllw1964
Image Posting Policy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#530334 - Mon Apr 20 2009 02:38 PM Headers, and intake for 292  
coal  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 75
Montana
I,m interested in putting headers, and offy intake on my 292, I assume I will have to heat it with water for drivability, not sure whether a small 4 barrel, or should it run a 2 barrel. Also which headers would be the best, cast type, or tubular. It will be in my 65 k20 and may be used for some light hauling would I be better off with this cool setup, or just rebuilding it stock.
Thanks, Coal



#530350 - Mon Apr 20 2009 03:26 PM Re: Headers, and intake for 292 [Re: coal]  
Hot Rod Dad  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,093
Taos, NM
Check out www.speedwaymotors.com They've got some header choices in both cast iron and tubular for the two different type of Stovebolt engines.

Cast iron is going to be more trouble-free and a lot quieter. Tubular is just plain noisier. It's not a bad sound, but they do make more noise. For that many cubic inches, I'd probably err toward a small cfm 4 barrel carb.


#530931 - Wed Apr 22 2009 02:41 AM Re: setup Headers, and intake for 292 - 1951 [Re: carolines truck]  
Roadmarks  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 888
Raleigh NC USA
Hey coal,

Everybody has their own way of doing things, so take all these opinions with a grain of salt. I am going with the Offenhauser intake, A 390cfm Holley, and a set of long tubular headers. There is no way my ears can tell the difference between one type of header and another. I am also building my own cold air box to feed the Holley. More important than carb and headers will be switching out your old distributor for a '75 or later HEI! The HEI makes a huge difference in starting, idle, and overall performance.

Best wishes,

Les


#531813 - Fri Apr 24 2009 09:33 PM Re: setup Headers, and intake for 292 - 1951 [Re: Roadmarks]  
Arpee  Offline
Wrench Fetcher
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Box Elder, SD
Hi Coal - I did almost the same thing with my '64 C20. It was originally a 292 3 speed on the column. The motor was really tired so when we did the rebuild we used "propane" pistons, added a very mild cam, Clifford 4 bl intake and Hedman headers. (He's "Otis" in the Gallery.) We also changed the 3 speed to a 5 speed and it works great as a driver. We do tow a trailer with our '56 Chevy on it and it does OK - it works hard on hills or fighting strong winds. When we put the engine together I had a 465 cfm Holley carb that I figured would be pretty close to what it would need so thats what we ran it with. It ran OK but seemed a little weak at lower rpm and didn't seem to have "crisp" throttle response. The plugs looked really white but I was thinking maybe they were a heat range too hot. On a whim I tried a different carb. I had a box stock Edlebrock 600 which I figured would be too much for it but thought I'd see what it would do. I was amazed. It ran MUCH better - throttle response was better it would pull from low rpm better and the plugs were tan. I know that on paper that is way too big a carb for that engine - I also know the engine runs way better than it did with the smaller carb and the fuel mileage is the same. For what it's worth...


#532209 - Sun Apr 26 2009 02:59 AM Re: setup Headers, and intake for 292 - 1951 [Re: Arpee]  
Oregoon  Offline
New Guy
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Republic of Southeast Portlan...
Keep us updated. I'm going the same route eventually. My 292 is getting a rebuild later this year, and headers/intake are in the works.


#534731 - Mon May 04 2009 03:24 PM Re: setup Headers, and intake for 292 - 1951 [Re: Oregoon]  
carolines truck  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,540
nor cal


Jim & Caroline

The highway is for gamblers
Better use your good sense."
Gooday
that's my 1ยข answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Lucinda Otter-Purr our 51-3104 bolt
http://s67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/1951otter/?start=all
Inliner #4655

Every Shaver
Now Can Snore
Six More Minutes
Than Before ...
Half A Pound for
Half a Dollar
Spread On Thin
Above the Collar

BURMA-SHAVE

#535528 - Thu May 07 2009 03:57 AM Re: Headers, and intake for 292 [Re: coal]  
coal  Offline
Shop Shark
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 75
Montana
appriciate all the advice and anymore that someone would what to lend!


#540022 - Fri May 22 2009 04:12 PM Re: Headers, and intake for 292 [Re: coal]  
Arpee  Offline
Wrench Fetcher
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Box Elder, SD
I know it goes against everything the "experts" say but I have a Clifford 4 barrel intake on the 292 in Otis ('64 C20, long box) and have never hooked up the water heat to the manifold. We live in South Dakota and don't drive him a lot in the dead of winter but in plenty of cold weather and have never had a problem. No explanation as to why but have run it for several years without a problem. For what it's worth...



Moderated by  KCMongo 

Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
#-->
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0