|
|
'
Oh Lord, I just gotta find it....
|
|
|
Forums60
Topics126,044
Posts1,018,664
Members45,412
| |
Most Online1,229
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
 Re: Boxing a 1934 frame?
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
Apprentice
|
The stock suspension was very stiff & the frame was designed to move....with IFS you want the suspension to work & the frame to not flex, thus the frame s/b boxed.
My 48 frame is fully boxed w/a Must II ifs.
Don Meyer-St Cloud, Fl
Don Meyer - Mech Engr(retired)
48 GMV
66 RR
64 Corvair
|
|
|
Re: Boxing a 1934 frame?
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
New Guy
|
I am new to Stovebolt and have been reading up on boxing the frame. My question leads back to welding on the crossmembers. I have a 1934 Chevy 1/2 pickup that I am putting a 383 stroker into. I plan on putting a Must. II front end in it with a 4 link in the rear. Wouldn't it be better to fully box the frame, while welding in all the crossmembers as well, or fully box it with leaving small gaps where the crossmembers are? I guess I am just confused on how to fully box the frame if I don't weld in the existing crossmembers or by welding in custom made crossmembers. Any information would be helpful.
Thanks,
Rusty McDonald-UT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
