We are still asking:
What did you get done on your Bolt today ????
The question, initially posted May 23, 2005, was:
"Whatcha do on your Bolt this weekend?"
After 51,906,997 views, 7378 replies over 185 pages, this thread in General Truck Talk is a happening! And it's not just weekends anymore.
Now with pictures and No BOTS.
So ...
What did you get done on your Bolt today????
|
|
|
'

Oh Lord, I just gotta find it....
|
|
Forums60
Topics127,583
Posts1,032,706
Members45,812
|
Most Online1,229 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
 T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
OP
Wrench Fetcher
|
Is it reasonalble to put a T5 and open running gear, better gear ratio behind a 216 CI. The engine runs good, good compresion, etc. Would the change out be worth it? It is in a '49 AD with a fair trans (3 on the tree) and oringinal rear end but I'm looking for better manners and a little more speed. Your thoughts please. THX
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,899
Shop Shark
|
Well, I don't have any experience with a 216, a t5, or a 49 chevy, so don't take my opinion as fact. I believe t5s have been placed behind 216 motors. I would not think a transmission and rear end swap would give you a whole lot with a 216 power plant. However if you were to change the 216 to a 235 or even better 261 at the same time, I believe the swap would be much more worthwhile. I would continue driving the truck like it is and start gathering pieces.
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,802
'Bolter
|
I think a T5 would do more for bragging rights behind a 216 than for performance. If you are going to an open drive shaft, find a 1955 and up which is 3.90. I think that's about a fast a gear as a 216 will pull and still have anything in high gear.
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 87
'Bolter
|
Ia49, I've been trying to make the same decision for over a year now and for me I am down to two choices. 1) go with a car 3 speed to keep the 3 on the tree, and a 3.73 rear. I do most of my driveing around town so I like a slow 1st & reverse and I can be happy with 55 or so top speed. 2) If you don't care about the shifter go with a t 5, much more versitale, I still think the 3.73 is about right. Power wise with the 216 I would not go any lower than 3.50 range with the rear.
1949 3100
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,200
'Bolter
|
Because there is less of a RPM drop between the 5 gears, than a 3 speed, the T5 will make a 216 preform much better. I would recommend it. I have done this swap for a few customers and they have been happy.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,530
'Bolter
|
I think it would work well behind a 216. Some of the T-5's from the 4 cyl. engines had a .86 o-drive. That would be just right for the 216.
They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,607
'Bolter
|
When I was in the process of building my 261 for my truck.I was also converting to open drive line with a t-5.I still had the original 216 engine in the truck and mated everything up to it.I put a t-5 and a 1967 Camaro rearend with 3:73 ring and pinion.The truck was really fun to drive while building the 261 for it.The combination woke the truck up.
Tim
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,658
Shop Shark
|
Just think about being able to stop it and steer it safely if you going to make it faster.
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,827
Shop Shark
|
My history with this type of set up went like this. I had a 216 with a stock three speed behind it in my 37 pick-up. I changed the 4:11 out to a 49-54 car 3:54 rear axle. Next I rebuilt the stock transmission with all new 54-55 gears. It helped allot and put me on the freeway at 55 to 65 mph with out too much trouble. I then put in a 55 front truck axle, totally rebuilt with modern tie rod ends on the tie rod and the drag link. Steered great! Then I went with a 56 261. Even better! Next I moved up to a T-5, a 55 Chev car 3:54 rear axle (open drive line), five lugs all the way around and a dual master cylinder. Now I'm in a nice spot. I can cruise (and stop) on the freeways or around the neighborhood with no problems! And the truck looks stock!
See Joe Fuchs' 1937 Chevrolet 1/2 Ton Pick Up on Facebook at The Top Of My Page. Go to: Joe Fuchs on Facebook "Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!"
My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Operators are standing by to take your calls!
|
|
|
 Re: T5 behind a 216?
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 39
OP
Wrench Fetcher
|
THX for the replies and ideas. I've got the stopping fixed with disc brakes up front but part of the deal would be better brakes in back and an E-brake. I'm looking for better driving around town and 55 on the highway. I just hate to throw a good engine away. Maybe later go to a 235/261 or V8. Thx again.
|
|
|
|
|