The Stovebolt Page Forums Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Work those trucks!




Share what you're up to this summer!

Stovebolt Site Search
 
Old Truck Calendars
Months of truck photos!
Nothing like an old truck calendar

Stovebolt Calendars

Check for details!


Who's Online Now
9 registered members (bartender, David C., CJ57, 5ptstar, DanCoyro, 1 invisible), 335 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums47
Topics115,175
Posts914,901
Members42,193
Most Online940
Apr 5th, 2017
Image Posting Policy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
261 vs 292 #382960 Mon Mar 03 2008 08:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 248
B
bigedpa Offline OP
Shop Shark
i am a real rookie when it comes to the 292. i was considering a 261 for my chevy 46 1/2t as it is a direct bolt in replacement for my 216. what are the differences between the 261 and the 292. are they that different that it would be "major fabrication" to get a 292 into the 46? has anyone done this already with some real world advice!! thanks


"it's only old if you can't find a use for it; otherwise it's cool and i'll use it."
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: bigedpa] #382981 Mon Mar 03 2008 09:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,736
53moneypit Offline
Shop Shark
The good news is that the 292 is a little shorter than a 235-261 and about 20% lighter. It's height is approx. the same so the fit is good. It uses the same bellhousing design as SBC V8's so all the trannys work well with it. The bad news is the motor mounts are in the middle of the block so mounts must be fabricated. If you get one from a large truck it may have the 90 degree oil filter on it and that might cause some problems as it sticks down pretty low. Nothing that a remote mount filter wouldn't cure however. I don't think your current transmission will bolt up to this engine. They are pretty powerful engines as stock and can be made to produce a great deal of power/torque with a few goodies. The lighter weight and siamesed head design make it a worthwhile swap.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: 53moneypit] #382996 Mon Mar 03 2008 09:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 42
L
Lineman_Bolter Offline
Shop Shark
one thing i wanted to point out is that one of the motor mounts on a 292 is in the middle and the other is closer to the front (cant remember which side is which but i think the pass side is the one closer to the front of the engine) if i am incorrect someone will help, or if i remember to check of my truck. but just my $.01 worth

army truck

Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: Lineman_Bolter] #383075 Tue Mar 04 2008 01:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,736
53moneypit Offline
Shop Shark
Not that it matters since a complete new mounting must be adapted or fabricated but for you technocrats it is the drivers side that is near the front and the passenger side that is near the center.


1953 Chevy 5-window 3100
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pix on Picturetrail

Dave
Engine & Driveline Moderator

If you can't make seventy by an easy road, don't go. ~~ Mark Twain
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: 53moneypit] #383092 Tue Mar 04 2008 02:00 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,899
B
bigbadswingdaddy Offline
Shop Shark
292 has 7 main bearings. The 261 only has 4. The 261 would definetely be eazier to install with a manual transmission in a 1946. The brake and clutch pedals mount to the bellhousing on trucks till the AD body change. You would be kind of limited to transmissions with the stock bellhousing, but you could always have an adapter made to sit between the bellhousing and the transmission. An A833 (Dodge) overdrive transmission would work real well behind a 261.

I mention the dodge transmission because the input shaft on dodge transmissions is typically 1 inch longer than the input shaft on the gm transmissions, which gives you the ability to make a 1 inch thick adapter to have everything mesh correctly. You can usually hook up your stock mechanical speedo to the mopar speedo gear, and change the speedo gears to suit your axle ratio and tire size.

I will be putting a dodge NV4500 behind my 302 GMC inline 6 in my 1940 GMC. I will be able to use the stock clutch linkage, but the brakes will take some engineering.

John

Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: bigedpa] #383220 Tue Mar 04 2008 04:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 248
B
bigedpa Offline OP
Shop Shark
is there a good (easy) recommended transmission swap to go with the 292 into a 46 1/2t. what are the production years on the 292?

my orig plan was a 261, stock bellhousing, clutch, and trans, w/a patricks 3:55 ring and pinion conversion.

but nothing is in stone right now, so parts and plans are easy to change.

thanks for the help


"it's only old if you can't find a use for it; otherwise it's cool and i'll use it."
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: bigedpa] #383252 Tue Mar 04 2008 06:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,044
C
carolines truck Offline
Shop Shark
'''''''The good news is that the 292 is a little shorter than a 235-261'''''''''

Not True

''''''and about 20% lighter'''''''

True

according to leo santucci's inline speed book they are the same length. the 302 is longer.
the 216-235-230-250-292 are the same length. the 292 is 1.75'' taller because of it's stroke thus producing more torque and a slower reving engine compared to a 230 - 250- 261. The 292 has offset motor mounts
http://s67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/1951otter/?action=view&current=DSC00313.jpg
http://s67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/1951otter/?action=view&current=579990-R1-012-4A.jpg

read
http://www.stovebolt.com/ubbthreads...2&topic=0&Search=true#Post338200

Last edited by carolines truck; Wed Mar 26 2008 12:04 AM.

Jim & Caroline

The highway is for gamblers
Better use your good sense."
Gooday
that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Lucinda Otter-Purr our 51-3104 bolt
http://s67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/1951otter/?start=all
Inliner #4655

Every Shaver
Now Can Snore
Six More Minutes
Than Before ...
Half A Pound for
Half a Dollar
Spread On Thin
Above the Collar

BURMA-SHAVE
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: carolines truck] #383255 Tue Mar 04 2008 06:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,899
B
bigbadswingdaddy Offline
Shop Shark
I guess you could put just about any transmission you like behind the 292. You are likely going to use a hydraulic clutch, for a manual transmission, so you will have to figure that part out. Once you figured out the hydraulic clutch the rest should be ez. As far as transmissions to reccomend...maybe a hybrid T5, but I would think the T5 to be light duty behind a 292. The good news is that your 46 probably won't hook to well, so the spinning of your tires will be the safety valve that keeps your transmission together. Again the A833, this time the GM version would be a great transmission, and you can find them with the gm bolt pattern so it will bolt up the the v8 style bellhousing. The hardest part of the whole 292 swap will be setting up your brake and clutch pedals.

Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: bigbadswingdaddy] #383257 Tue Mar 04 2008 06:29 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,044
C
carolines truck Offline
Shop Shark

Last edited by carolines truck; Tue Mar 04 2008 06:35 AM.

Jim & Caroline

The highway is for gamblers
Better use your good sense."
Gooday
that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Lucinda Otter-Purr our 51-3104 bolt
http://s67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/1951otter/?start=all
Inliner #4655

Every Shaver
Now Can Snore
Six More Minutes
Than Before ...
Half A Pound for
Half a Dollar
Spread On Thin
Above the Collar

BURMA-SHAVE
Re: 261 vs 292 [Re: carolines truck] #383693 Wed Mar 05 2008 04:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 342
I
InMy40s Offline
Shop Shark
There was a guy out on eBay that was selling an adapter plate that let you bolt up the 292/v8 pattern directly to a stock 50s bell housing.

I was thinking of doing that and getting the Buffalo Engineering bell housing with the welded on break and clutch pedal mount.

Anyhow I haven't gone that route yet as I still have a few 235s sitting around. That is a very simple swap and is enough power to be scary with original equipment in my 1940 trucks.

I would like to put a 292 in my 1 1/2 ton but I don't know how to stop it yet.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  53moneypit, Woogeroo 

Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2