The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?
Not a hanging chad... The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 36,294 views in those 12 forums.

Searching the Site

Get info about how to search the entire Stovebolt site here. To do a search for just the forums, get those details in the IT Shortbus fourm.
Who's Online Now
15 members (delky, Cardriver333, baldeagle, 32vsnake, 2ManyTrucks, 55shaker, 2 invisible), 75 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
The Zone
Forum Statistics
Forums65
Topics123,445
Posts999,556
Members47,279
Most Online1,229
Jan 21st, 2020
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,368
F
Herder of Cats, Goats, and Sheep (moderator)
If the springs have never been replaced, what about the spring bushings and shackles? Those could be the source of your problem.

You said you "replaced everything". What does that include in your mind? Apparently not the springs.

Shocks? Drag link? King pins?

There is nothing inherantly wrong with solid axles, pretty much every big truck being made still uses them.


From the Rocky Mountains?
Check in with the RM Bolters!

HiPo Forum Moderator

1958 Apache, long bed Fleetside, V8 w/SM420
Driveable but the rear axle needs work.

1959 Apache, long bed Fleetside that has been in the family for 25 years but in desperate need of love.
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 3,187
O
'Bolter
Originally Posted by Elmo
The leaf springs have never been replaced. Think that has anything to do with the handling?

Weak springs will allow the axle to hop all over tarnation instead of resisting the hill or valley that the wheel goes over.

How many miles would you estimate your truck's suspension has on it?


Originally Posted by Bill Hanlon
Anti-sway bars do their work while in a turn. Shouldn't have much effect at a pot hole.

Yes, a handling improvement of any kind would be welcome, I think.


1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom)
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)
1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck)
1956 Cadillac Sixty Special Fleetwood (The Godfather)
1966 Oldsmobile Toronado (The Purple Knif)
1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red)
1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe
1979 Ford F-100
1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red)
1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 276
E
Elmo Offline OP
'Bolter
How many miles would you estimate your truck's suspension has on it?

Probably 100 thousand miles

Elmo

Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 92
S
'Bolter
I would bet the rear spring hanger pins and bushings are worn. A small amount of wear in these will make them act really stupid. Even with regular greasing, mine had lots of wear at 10k miles after replacement.

Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 3,187
O
'Bolter
Personally, I would repair the existing suspension and steering systems before trying to re-engineer the truck.

I'm certainly not an expert on the handling characteristics of the AD series truck. I am, however, extremely familiar with the handling characteristics of antique vehicles in general. Unlike most people that own antique vehicles for weekend cruises or tooling around the neighborhood once a month, and who drive modern vehicles for the majority of the time on the road, I have never owned a modern vehicle.

All of the vehicles in my signature line are used as daily transportation, rush hour interstate travel, and vacation trips of over 1000miles (the 1995 F-150 is actually my mom's - I just maintain it.)

I will categorically state that the handling characteristics of vehicles of the era we're discussing are not anywhere close to being as bad as many people assume. The big cars of the '50s are not lumbering dinosaurs that wallow in turns and curves or have loose steering or anything like what is often described by those who have never driven them.

When properly repaired/restored and driven within their respective limits, these vehicles, including your AD 3/4 ton truck will perform extremely well and without scaring the daylights out of you every time you hit a pothole or sharp curve.

With modern shocks and radial tires, the performance is even better.


1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom)
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)
1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck)
1956 Cadillac Sixty Special Fleetwood (The Godfather)
1966 Oldsmobile Toronado (The Purple Knif)
1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red)
1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe
1979 Ford F-100
1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red)
1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 3,187
O
'Bolter
If you do decide to replace your springs and bushings, etc, I would do both front and rear to keep the truck level and prevent the front end from doing one thing while the rear end does something else on the same bump in the road.


1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom)
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)
1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck)
1956 Cadillac Sixty Special Fleetwood (The Godfather)
1966 Oldsmobile Toronado (The Purple Knif)
1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red)
1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe
1979 Ford F-100
1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red)
1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,119
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Originally Posted by Otto Skorzeny
Weak springs will allow the axle to hop all over tarnation instead of resisting the hill or valley that the wheel goes over.
That's really a function of failed shock absorbers. Weak (sagged) springs will just change the height of the suspension. They'll likely have the same amount of spring rate (springiness) although seized bushings can make them stiffer (unable to move like designed.)

Originally Posted by Otto Skorzeny
If you do decide to replace your springs and bushings, etc, I would do both front and rear to keep the truck level and prevent the front end from doing one thing while the rear end does something else on the same bump in the road.
Spring rates on front and rear were different as the came from the factory, so the front and rear will always to different things on the same bump. But changing from the factory spring rates on one axle would make the truck act differently. But again, shock absorbers control the bounce or hop.

Straight front axles are still used today (many 4x4 trucks), and they ride satisfactorily.


Kevin
Newest Project - 51 Chevy 3100 work truck. Photos [flickr.com]
#2 - '29 Ford pickup restored from the ground up.
First car '29 Ford Special Coupe
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,895
W
'Bolter
Elmo, my 54 did that a couple of times and I finally said enough. As I said above I replaced it with an AMC Pacer front end. It was not cheap then and it is not cheap now comparatively now.


Ron, The Computer Greek
I love therefore I am.

1960 MGA Roadster Sold 7/18/2017
1954 3100 Chevy truck in the Gallery [stovebolt.com]
2017 Buick Encore
See more pix [photos.google.com]
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 6,211
Unrepentant VW Lover
Just to jump on Kevin, Ed and Otto's bandwagon ...

Replacing/upgrading your front end because you *want* to is one thing. And if that's the reason, more power to you and we'll help all we can.

Replacing/upgrading your front end because you think you *need* to is entirely another. And for all the reasons stated above. I'll just add that from pickups to tractor trailer trucks, I've put a fair amount of highway and back road miles in on straight axle trucks. The truck I drive for work most days has a straight axle (but with 11R22.5 tires, I don't mind the power steering ...;) ) and I hit plenty of pot holes around the Nation's Capitol ... I have no problem or hesitation to take my unrestored (but well maintained wink ) '49 1-Ton on the interstate -- and have, many times. It will cruise nicely all day at 65 MPH and sprint to 70 when needed. Straight axle, Huck brakes and bias ply tires. It has a little wander above 60, but its manageable. Potholes? Not too bad. At speeds above 60 MPH, I just try to hold the wheel straight and the truck will quickly resume course just fine after a few milliseconds of hinkyness.

Why is it able to do this? Have I put sway bars on it? Have I upgraded to an IFS? Do I have Power steering?? No to all of those. I am running the truck in its original configuration (suspension wise wink I did put a 261 and a 4.10 gear set in the truck) because *everything* is still within spec -- Springs, shackles, steering box, tie rod ends, pitman arm, front alignment, etc, etc. Just *one* of these things out of whack will cause issues at modern highway speeds.

Does my truck drive as well as a modern truck? No, of course not. But it drives fine. It's a different experience and requires a little more attention to what you are doing. Doable? yes. Enjoyable? Certainly.

The '65 GMC 1.5 ton I used to own was the real teller. It was a firetruck and it only had 8,000 miles on it when I bought it in 2007. Mechanically, it was still new. There was zero wear in the front end. You could drive that truck with one finger, even at slow speeds. At 65 MPH (um, I removed the governor and replaced the crappy Stromberg carburetor with a Holly 300), that truck handled like it was on rails!

So ... in my opinion, FWIW ... The factory straight axle/spring suspension/manual steering set up is perfectly adequate for today's highways as the boys have said above ... IF ... and this is a big if ... *everything* in the front end is within spec -- king pins, alignment, tie rod ends, pitman arm, drag link ends, steering box adjustment, springs, spring shackles, spring shackle pins, tires (age, tread, balance and pressure). The more *any* of those are off, the less enjoyable your driving experience will be.

Bottom line -- If you *want* to upgrade the front end, you go right ahead and we'll help you all the way. Just don't think you have to because the straight axle set up is "bad."

If you have a straight axle truck and it handles poorly, it just needs to be fixed, not heavily modified. Not at all against performance upgrades (Evan ... Heck, I'm a Group W Bench Stovebolter myself -- I put a 261 in my '49 wink ... and created a nuisance ... ) -- Just do them because you want to, not because you think you have to.

Respectfully,
John


John

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Will Rogers

1927 Chevrolet Capitol 1-Ton Express -- A work in progress
In Project Journals
1949 Chevrolet 3804
In Gallery Forum
1973 IH 1310 Dump
2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley)
In Daily Driver Gallery


Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,732
5
Renaissance Man
You just need to take apart and inspect every single part of the suspension, front and rear, and replace what is worn and adjust what is not worn out.
Spring shackle pins and bushings.
Tierod ends. They need to be thoroughly cleaned and inspected. Make sure balls are round and not egg-shaped. Adjust them according to the Chevrolet Truck Shop Manual.
Draglink ends. Ditto, see tierods above.
Properly adjust the steering box with draglink separated from pitman arm.
New tires would help.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5