The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Major event in Virginia
Look Look Look
ODSS Bolters
head to

WINCHESTER
Virginia

September 21-23
Rolling in Winchester VA Read the details.

Searching the Site

Get info about how to search the entire Stovebolt site here. To do a search for just the forums, get those details in the IT Shortbus fourm.
Who's Online Now
19 members (Bill Marlow, 52Carl, 55shaker, coopertechparts, 122099NOLL, 32vsnake, 2 invisible), 131 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
The Zone
Forum Statistics
Forums65
Topics123,369
Posts998,587
Members47,287
Most Online1,229
Jan 21st, 2020
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,037
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Just a guess here, but wouldn't the hole in the rear have been machined enough to create a place for a live center for machining the main journals?


Kevin
Newest Project - 51 Chevy 3100 work truck. Photos [flickr.com]
#2 - '29 Ford pickup restored from the ground up.
First car '29 Ford Special Coupe
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 3,592
AD Addict
I would at a minimum, I would do a runout of the bushing bore (or the bushing itself). That would confirm if it is usable as is. As per the “Chevrolet Truck Shop Manual” the pilot bearing runout should not exceed .008” TIR (Total Indicator Reading). That is quite a large tolerance so it may not be so critical.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum

‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters
“Three on the Tree” & 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: 12v w/alternator, HEI & PCV
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 341
J
'Bolter
Dorman states the 690 034 pilot is "only used for automatic transmission conversion to manual transmission. Powerglide to 3 speed manual 1.06 OD."
Using guide pins, the tranny slides in place with no effort.
Runs smooth.


~~ Jethro
1954 3100
Back to Life
In the Dity Gallery
1951 3100 (gone) / 1956 4400 (still in the neighborhood) / 1957 6400 with dump body (retired) / 1959 3100 panel (in the woods junked) / 1978 Custom Deluxe K10 / 1993 S-10 4.3 / 2004 Chevy Crew Cab / 1945 John Deere H / 1952 John Deere B / 1966 John Deere 2510 / 1967 John Deere 1020
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,719
5
Renaissance Man
The hole in my '53 235 "w/Powerglide" crankshaft accepted the Dorman 690 034 perfectly and ran true with a 3 speed and a T5 transmission. That hole looked to be machined to me.
Kevin brings up a good point about the need for a concentric hole for machining the journals.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,953
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
A dial indicator is your friend- - - - -like the slogan Sun used to put on all their test equipment- - - -"We test, not guess!"
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 3,592
AD Addict
If the Shop Manual is calling out a tolerance, it is something that should be checked. That bushing is tough to change after it all reassembled.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum

‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters
“Three on the Tree” & 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: 12v w/alternator, HEI & PCV
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,036
G
Insomniac
I wish I had seen this thread last Fall when I was dealing with a stubborn pilot bushing extraction and install. Seems like shoddy workmanship on GM's part.


Gord
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,953
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Originally Posted by Gord&Fran
Seems like shoddy workmanship on GM's part.

Seems like pretty good production cost control- - - -not doing unnecessary machining on a crankshaft that was not expected to last beyond the warranty period, 60 years ago. Did the foundry and the engine factory really care that someone would be trying to fit a square peg into a round hole nearly a century after the engine was made?
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5