|
What's happening?
Find out in
THE SHOPS !
Genearl Truck Talk
20,267 threads; 177,521 posts
The Engine Shop
32,460 threads; 255,065 post
Driveline
8,796 threads; 65,970 posts
The Electrical Bay
9,505 threads; 74,285 posts
Sub: The Radio Bench
The HiPo Shop
5,040 threads; 46,029 posts
Paint & Body Shop
12,505 threads; 81,120 posts
Sub: The Doors
Interiors
4,059 threads; 26,817 posts
The Tool Chest
1,762 threads; 26,817 posts
Making a Stovebolt Bed
1,052 threads; 6,659 posts
|
|
Forums59
Topics128,597
Posts1,041,772
Members46,055
|
Most Online1,229 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,408
OP
'Bolter
|
What master cylinder do you use to upgrade a stock 54 gmc with drum brakes. All the imfo I find seems to be for upgrades with dscs on the front .I was thinking a 1967 chev truck master cylinder .Also with drums all around is a proportioning valve required.Thanks Kevin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,004
'Bolter
|
I can't tell you about the master cylinder. As for the proportioning valve, I've never used one on my 1952 and I still have drum brakes. I considered one back when these valves were getting popular, but a friend who ran a chain of brake repair shops told me not to worry unless I was having trouble and if that was the case to let him see what it needed. He went on to explain the valve wouldn't have been there as it came along after 1952 but unless I was having trouble with rear wheels locking up the system designed by GM would be just fine without anyone trying to re-design it. I've never noticed the rear wheels breaking loose, but I could always see that they might have that tendency. He did also say the rear tires in any pickup should always have good tread and should be kept inflated to the right pressure.
Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 T5 with 3.07 rear end
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 521
'Bolter
|
I don't know that I'd classify a conversion to disc brakes as an upgrade. Properly adjusted drums provide more than adequate stopping power. In many cases stopping distance will increase with the use of discs. That's one reason dump trucks and semis use drums all around.
The only advantage discs have over drums is that they don't overheat under repeated hard braking. I doubt your truck will be subjected to such abuse unless you're auto-crossing it.
Last edited by Otto Skorzeny; Tue Jun 21 2022 01:48 PM.
1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe 1950 Chevrolet 3100 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville 1966 Oldsmobile Toronado 1966 Ford Mustang 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe 1979 Ford F-100 1976 Ford F-150 1995 Ford F-150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,408
OP
'Bolter
|
Not wanting discs just wanting to upgrade the master cylinder .wondering what is used for a master was thinking a 67 truck with drums all around to replace the single master cylinder .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,382
Curmudgeon
|
"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use." "I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 521
'Bolter
|
Not wanting discs just wanting to upgrade the master cylinder .wondering what is used for a master was thinking a 67 truck with drums all around to replace the single master cylinder . Aahh... I skim read your post and thought you were doing discs. Sorry.
1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe 1950 Chevrolet 3100 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville 1966 Oldsmobile Toronado 1966 Ford Mustang 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe 1979 Ford F-100 1976 Ford F-150 1995 Ford F-150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,408
OP
'Bolter
|
Thanks buoymaker that helps
|
|
|
|
|
|