|
|
'
Oh Lord, I just gotta find it....
|
|
|
Forums60
Topics126,046
Posts1,018,694
Members45,413
| |
Most Online1,229
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
 Re: 216 dilemma
|
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 5,278
Unrepentant VW Lover
|
I agree with Jim and the others advocating for an early ('54 -'55 1st series -- or a crate motor built later but out of the '54 mold) 261. Bolt-in, easy swap, easier rebuild, more power, etc.etc. If you really want a driver, I say skip the 235 and go for the 261. Coupled with Tim's recommendation for the rear ring and pinion swap, you'll have a vastly more driveable truck without losing the "old truck" feel and drive.
If you do all this, be sure to go through the truck's brakes and front end, too. Don't trust any of the previous owners/sellers/brokers -- it's *your* life to lose in an accident, not theirs.
John
'49 Chevrolet 3804
|
|
|
Re: 216 dilemma
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 31,392
Bubba
|
. . .
If you do all this, be sure to go through the truck's brakes and front end, too. Don't trust any of the previous owners/sellers/brokers -- it's *your* life to lose in an accident, not theirs. Heed John's advice: Check and set all front-end and brake-system parts to "factory specs".
|
|
|
Re: 216 dilemma
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,991
'Bolter
|
I had that exact setup too, 261 with 3.55 rear gears. Top speed was over 85. Amazing torque for hills.
|
|
|
Re: 216 dilemma
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 31,392
Bubba
|
 yes
|
|
|
Re: 216 dilemma
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 23
OP
'Bolter
|
Great advice from all. New to the forum and really glad I joined. 261 it is. I’m stoked to get started. Will help “make the truck a little more mine”. Thanks again. Look forward to more conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
