'

Oh Lord, I just gotta find it....
|
|
Forums59
Topics128,081
Posts1,037,106
Members45,928
|
Most Online1,229 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 81
OP
'Bolter
|
Looking to get a 283 rebuilt for a truck project, any recommendations for a shop in NC or VA are appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,558
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
|
There's nothing particulatry mysterious about a 283, other than the fact that the newest ones are over 50 years old, and finding one that hasn't been rebuilt a couple of times already is going to be difficult. Are you looking for a "numbers-correct" restoration, or just a reliable daily driver? Finding a set of 58 CC combustion chamber 305 cylinder heads from the late 1970's or early 80's will be a lot simpler than locating rebuildable 283 heads, and they're a bolt-on swap that will give you the correct compression ratio. Jerry
"Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose" Kris Kristofferson Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
WAG MORE- - - - - -BARK LESS!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 81
OP
'Bolter
|
Thanks for the reply. Definitely not a correct restoration, this will be going in a 52 International L132 to make it a driver. Will likely pair it with a sm465 and a 14 bolt rear end.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,558
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
|
I'd suggest finding a 305, then. It's got 1/2" more stroke, and a lot more torque than a 283. The only way to do truck stuff with a 283 is to run a very low gear ratio and keep it wound up all the time. There's also a bunch more 305's out there than 283's, and if you happen to have a correct engine number for a restorer to use, your engine will be worth a big chunk of pocket change, regardless of what condirion it's in at the moment. Jerry
"Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose" Kris Kristofferson Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
WAG MORE- - - - - -BARK LESS!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,344
Moderator - The Electrical Bay and Rocky Mountain Bolters
|
Have you considered an LS swap? rather than an old sbc?
Another quality post.
Real Trucks Rattle
HELP! The Paranoids are after me!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,496
'Bolter
|
What about a 345 or 392 and 5 speed?
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 81
OP
'Bolter
|
I already have the 283 and it does run and I know it won't be a powerhouse. My thoughts were if I don't use the 283 then I'd go with a 350 or a 383 stroker. How does the cost of the LS swap compare to the sbc? What manual trans would work? This truck will be hauling 2-3 tons.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 81
OP
'Bolter
|
Ed, are you talking about an international motor and trans? I would certainly consider it if I had access to that combo.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,558
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
|
If you do decide to use the 283, I'd suggest a few more gears- - - -like maybe a 2 speed rear end, or a Brownie. As I mentioned before, a lugged-down short stroke engine won't get out of its own way. I'd suggest a big block Chevy for doing some serious freight hauling- - - -a 427 or 454. You can find some low mileage big blocks in retired motorhomes. Jerry
"Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose" Kris Kristofferson Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
WAG MORE- - - - - -BARK LESS!
|
|
|
|
|