The Stovebolt Page Forums Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Work those trucks!




Stovebolt is pleased to support the Salvation Army!
We're doing fine but many around the World are not. Instead of making a contribution to us this holiday season, how about making your contribution to a great organization with a long history of helping people in need around the world?

Stovebolt Site Search
 
Old Truck Calendars
Months of truck photos!
Nothing like an old truck calendar

Stovebolt Calendars

Check for details!


Who's Online Now
3 registered members (Ott3r, Waldheri51, TPR57C), 155 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics116,503
Posts930,041
Members42,646
Most Online940
Apr 5th, 2017
Image Posting Policy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
1964 327 V8 question #1333950 Sat Nov 16 2019 02:14 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 74
L
LAJones48 Offline OP
Wrench Fetcher
I plan to install a 1964 327 V8 into my 1957 Chevy NAPCO truck. The engine appears to be a1964 truck engine based on the numbers. I’m trying to find out if this engine originally had an alternator or a generator. Any ideas of where to look are appreciated.
Thanks,
Larry

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1333952 Sat Nov 16 2019 02:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 28,886
tclederman Offline
Boltergeist


Tim
1954Advance-Design.com
1954 3106 Carryall Suburban - part of the family for 48 years
1954 3104 5-window pickup w/Hydra-Matic - part of the family for 14 years
Z-series (54/55) GMC 350 (2-ton) COE - now part of Dave's family
- If you have to stomp on your foot-pedal starter, either you, or your starter, or your engine, has a problem.
- The 216 and early 235 engine are not "splash oilers" - this is a splash oiler.
Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: tclederman] #1333957 Sat Nov 16 2019 02:45 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 74
L
LAJones48 Offline OP
Wrench Fetcher
Great idea. Thanks!

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1333962 Sat Nov 16 2019 03:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,258
H
Hotrod Lincoln Offline
Boltergeist
I'm pretty sure 63 was the first year for alternators, the ones with a 4-connector external regulator. Those things are a royal pain in the butt to work with. Unless you're building something that's supposed to look factory original, a 10-SI internal regulated alternator from the middle 1970's or newer would be a much better choice, reliability-wise.
Jerry


The murder victim was drowned in a bathtub full of Rice Krispies and milk.
The coroner blamed the crime on a cereal killer!

Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1333963 Sat Nov 16 2019 03:12 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 74
L
LAJones48 Offline OP
Wrench Fetcher
Thank you. I’m trying to stay period correct, but it will be a driver and get used as originally intended so I’m okay with upgrades.

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1334063 Sun Nov 17 2019 06:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,624
5
52Carl Offline
Master Gabster
I hope that you are planning staying out of the gas pedal. 327s are short stroke engines and rev up real fast. You have 4 u-joints and a transfer case designed to handle a low RPM 125 HP inline six 235.
I am not trying to dissuade you from doing your swap, I just know a guy with a '57 NAPCO who went with a 300 hp 350 crate motor and could not keep the bearings in the transfer case or was blowing out U-joints.
Granted, he could not keep his foot out of the gas.

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1334085 Sun Nov 17 2019 03:52 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 74
L
LAJones48 Offline OP
Wrench Fetcher
Hi Carl. Thank you for the warning. I do understand the risks involved with running the 327. There was a guy many years ago in our area who put a 389 in his GMC version of a Cameo that was also a NAPCO conversion. He was known for destroying the spider gears in his rear differentials by doing burnouts. I had a 1958 GMC factory NAPCO Carryall that had a 389 installed after the 336 wore out. I never had any problems other than keeping the fuel tank full. This is a truck version of the 327, 2 bolt mains, focus on low rpm torque etc. I’m 71 years old so I probably won’t get too crazy with the skinny pedal. Again, I do appreciate you advice.
Thanks,
Larry

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1334441 Wed Nov 20 2019 04:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,624
5
52Carl Offline
Master Gabster
Can't wait to see some pictures, Larry, better yet, I'd like to hear it run. I love the sound of those short stroke bumblebee engines.

Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1334443 Wed Nov 20 2019 04:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,258
H
Hotrod Lincoln Offline
Boltergeist
You'd love the short stroke screamer I've got on the drawing board- - - - -a 305 block with a destroked 283 crankshaft- - - -a 2 7/8" stroke crankshaft in a 305 block gives a displacement of 250 cubic inches- - - - -sort of like a bumblebee on steroids!
Jerry


The murder victim was drowned in a bathtub full of Rice Krispies and milk.
The coroner blamed the crime on a cereal killer!

Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
Re: 1964 327 V8 question [Re: LAJones48] #1334510 Wed Nov 20 2019 08:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 424
T
TUTS 59 Offline
Shop Shark
HRL, I would love to see that built. I have always thought about a built 305 or 307. I had a 305 with a Crane version of the Duntov 30/30 cam, it sounded nasty.


Craig

Come,Bleed or Blister somethings got to give!!!
Q:"What yah runnin"
A:"3/8 drive Black and Decker aquarium pump motor" (the movie HOTROD)

59' Apache 31, long term project (30 years and counting)
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Woogeroo 

Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3