The Stovebolt Page Forums Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Thank you for supporting those who support this site!
Happy New Year

Ring in the new year with some quality time with your old truck! Now is a great time to tackle a winter project. If you do not have access to your truck, start your parts list for spring!

The days are officially getting longer now, you know!

American Classic Truck Parts still offers a 10% discount to Stovebolters for items in stock.

Keep Warm!

Stovebolt Site Search
Loading
Old Truck Calendars
2016 Calendars!
12 months of Stovebolts

We have seven 2016 calendars (two all new) in the Hoo-ya Shoppe and we are working on more.

Check for details!


Who's Online
44 registered (59 Apache Dlx, 2-Ton, 55 SHAKER, 2ton46, 1958Viking, 6cylindersovertexas, 2 invisible), 243 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
37,937 Registered Members
47 Forums
99,504 Topics
770,329 Posts

Most users ever online: 509 @ Thu Nov 12 2015 04:34 PM
Today's Birthdays
68 longbed, bigtim44, Bobby C., FAST55, jgardner11, Joe Faricy, sleepindawg, THEWRENCH, Thruwurkin
Image Posting Policy
New Reply
Topic Options
#838886 - Mon Mar 26 2012 05:41 PM 235 Intake Manifold
fab51 Offline
Shop Shark
Registered: Fri Jan 28 2005 12:00 PM
Posts: 363
Loc: Central Missouri
So, I'm probably overthinking things again...

Not too long ago, I picked up an Offenhauser dual carb intake, and was planning on using dual Carter YF's. After playing around with things recently, I've found that I don't have a good matched set of carbs. So, I've been wondering...

Did anyone ever produce an aluminum single carb intake, that would have better flow characteristics than the stock intake?

Which stock intake is better? I have a truck intake with the tall center section, but I also have a car intake with the short center section. Which one flows better?

I've about talked myself into staying with one, well tuned Carter YF. I just want to know which manifold will perform the best.

TIA thumbs_up
_________________________
-Tim
'51 Chevy 3104 w/'56 235, 848 Head, HEI Dizzy, Corvette Cam & Split Manifold
Top
#838917 - Mon Mar 26 2012 07:37 PM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: fab51]
Pre '68 Dave Offline
Shop Shark
Registered: Mon Jan 08 2001 12:00 PM
Posts: 4300
Loc: Snohomish,WA,USA
The difference in short and tall intake is not car v truck. The parts book shows pass and truck using the same intake. The tall was used up through 1958, then because the hood was lowered on the car line in 1959 the shorter intake was used.
As far as which flows better I doubt there is much difference although the rated HP went up in the later years. That most likely had nothing to do with the intake.
Both manifolds take a difference length throttle rod.
_________________________
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Top
#839172 - Tue Mar 27 2012 05:48 PM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: Pre '68 Dave]
fab51 Offline
Shop Shark
Registered: Fri Jan 28 2005 12:00 PM
Posts: 363
Loc: Central Missouri
Too bad...I was kinda hoping I had something special. ohwell
_________________________
-Tim
'51 Chevy 3104 w/'56 235, 848 Head, HEI Dizzy, Corvette Cam & Split Manifold
Top
#839197 - Tue Mar 27 2012 07:17 PM Re: 235 Intake Manifold [Re: fab51]
mark50 Offline
New Guy
Registered: Wed Nov 28 2007 08:46 PM
Posts: 13
Loc: San Francisco CA
I'm pretty sure Nicson made an aluminum single carb manifold. Did it flow better than a stock version? I have no idea. There was one on eBay a couple of months ago. I'm guessing it's rarer than their more common 2 x 1 manifolds as most guys installing an aftermarket manifold were looking for horsepower gains.
Top

Moderator:  53moneypit, Woogeroo 

Home | FAQ | Forum | Swap Meet | Gallery | Tech Tips | Links | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
#-->