22007 Members
36 Forums
53849 Topics
397001 Posts
Max Online: 180 @ Sun Mar 23 2008 10:37 AM
|
|
|
#589355 - Tue Nov 03 2009 10:49 AM
327 torque monster
|
Apprentice
|
Registered: Fri Apr 07 2006 12:00 PM
Posts: 46
Loc: Minnesota
|
|
I recently acquired a 327 (.040). I want to put it in my 67 chevy truck. I want to create a kind of sleeper, I don't care about top end, just massive torque! What can I get out of this engine and what can I expect to pay. Are there any websites I can look at?
Nick
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589365 - Tue Nov 03 2009 11:56 AM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: N. Phillips]
|
Extreme Gabster
|
Registered: Mon Feb 23 2004 12:00 PM
Posts: 4245
Loc: Nashville, TN
|
|
Unfortunately, the 3 1/4 inch stroke on the 327 doesn't make much torque- - - - -they're much better at running higher RPM than some of the longer stroke engines like the 350 or 400. You can install a "RV" camshaft from one of the aftermarket cam grinders, and raise the compression by milling the heads or going to a set of 58CC 305 cylinder heads with a lot of custom valve work done to them. That puts you into premium-fuel range on compression, though!There's a machine shop in Florida selling the tricked-out 305 heads, but I don't remember their website at the moment. You'll be a lot better off doing some high-torque tricks to a 350, though. There's nearly 1/4" more stroke with that engine, and long strokes make torque! Jerry
_________________________
Ignorance can be fixed; stupid is forever!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589386 - Tue Nov 03 2009 01:00 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: N. Phillips]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Mar 04 2009 08:07 PM
Posts: 220
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
what is the application for the torque ron
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589409 - Tue Nov 03 2009 03:20 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: padresag]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Mon Feb 05 2007 12:00 PM
Posts: 161
Loc: Indiana
|
|
To add to what HotRod Lincoln said, you can also stroke a 350 to 383 c.i. put fuel injection on it and get even more torque. And I agree, if you are looking for low end torque, forget the 327.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589453 - Tue Nov 03 2009 06:30 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: Tim K]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Feb 11 2009 10:16 PM
Posts: 164
Loc: Loganville, Georgia
|
|
I built up my 350 as a torque monster with the RV cam and some other things, and it is a monster. It'll pull up a wall. Go with the 350. They are everywhere and can be made to suit whatever the heck you're wanting.
Edited by Reedster (Tue Nov 03 2009 06:30 PM)
_________________________
"So this year, I am upgraging my policy of zero tolerance to one of SUB-zero tolerance, which is MORE than zero." -Principal Jindraike
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589500 - Tue Nov 03 2009 07:42 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: Tim K]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Mar 04 2009 08:07 PM
Posts: 220
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
To add to what HotRod Lincoln said, you can also stroke a 350 to 383 c.i. put fuel injection on it and get even more torque. And I agree, if you are looking for low end torque, forget the 327. if it comes to that you can also stick in a 572, the question was though about a 327. maybe he likes 327's and nobody has honestly answered his question except to put in a bigger eng I had a 212 cu in eng in my truck that would pull the ass onff most 350 engs. they say that size is not what matters but how it is used my brother put a 454 with 750 ft lbs in his 28' fish boat 20 years ago. the motor only cost him about $28,000.00 20 years ago. the boys at the DDA shop where they ran it up on the dyno had their eyes popping when they read the values. that torque never really did him much good but was just a by product of what happened in the build to get him to another opening 200 mi away for another opening the next morning. it didn't bring in fish any better but got him there to more openings so that he had the opportunity to catch more fish.it did cost him 125 litres of gas an hour at 3/4 throttle ron
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589587 - Tue Nov 03 2009 10:18 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: padresag]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Jul 30 2008 06:37 AM
Posts: 97
Loc: Essex Mass.
|
|
Want low end torque? Put in a Big Block! You'll get torque at an idle.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589601 - Tue Nov 03 2009 10:41 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: JeffL]
|
Extreme Gabster
|
Registered: Mon May 08 2006 12:00 PM
Posts: 5745
Loc: DANVILLE IL
|
|
Want low end torque? Put in a Big Block! You'll get torque at an idle. Or go with a 292!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589626 - Wed Nov 04 2009 12:51 AM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: LONGBOX55]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Mar 04 2009 08:07 PM
Posts: 220
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
Want low end torque? Put in a Big Block! You'll get torque at an idle. Or go with a 292! right
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#589746 - Wed Nov 04 2009 02:18 PM
Re: 327 torque monster
[Re: padresag]
|
Wrench Fetcher
|
Registered: Wed Oct 20 2004 12:00 PM
Posts: 86
|
|
It sounds like he already has the 327. If it's a large journal block, and since 327's and 350's share a 4" bore, buy a rebuild kit for a 350 with the crank and now you have a 350, or buy a kit for a 383 stroker and you now have one of those. The kicker is, it has to be a late model large journal 327 block. I believe the 68-69's were the only large journal blocks.
John
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|